... and is too out of touch to know darn well that her husband is a serial cheater as his pants have a habit of being unzipped?
Would you vote for such a woman if people swear that she is the brightest person in her party?
2007-01-24 15:07:09 · 16 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I confess to not understanding what she was talking about until I saw BushOilCo in action. I thought she was making it up and saying they were just being picked on, and then I saw how Rove and friends were scaring and manipulating the public, and how those who disagreed with current policy were labeled as "on the side of the terrorists, and therefore traitors" by implication. There are those on the Right who are conspiring to give this nation a makeover, and many are not fond of the new look. Hillary has shown the people of New York enough to be handily reelected to the Senate. She has begun to run for our nation's highest office, and only time will tell who will end up voting for her. From what she has shown us recently, she would be an intelligent breath of fresh air after "most of our imports come from outside the country" Bush.
2007-01-24 15:15:04 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As far as her discussing a "vast Right-Wing conspiracy," I'd have to know more about what she was talking about. The events involving Mark Foley could easily be describe as such, since many Republicans knew about his activities and kept quite in hopes of not hurting the Republican Party.
And when you talk about her being "out of touch" because her husband had an affair, what does that have to do with anything? As far as we know President Bill Clinton has not had any kind of affair since the Monica Lewinsky scandal. If Hillary feels she can trust her husband than that is her personal business and it has nothing to do with her ability to conduct the job of President of the United States. Similar to how President Clinton's affair had nothing to do with his job performance, yet Republicans were willing to impeach him for it.
As of now, I see no reason why Hillary Clinton isn't the best choice for President of the United States. She will clearly do a much better job than George W. Bush has done, and it would be a huge step forward for our Country to elect a woman as President. Your going to have to come up with much better reasons for me to start questioning Hillary Clinton's ability. And for the record, comparing Sen. Obama's name to Osama and calling him a radical Muslim, isn't going to work to make me think he isn't a good choice as well.
2007-01-24 23:25:13 · answer #2 · answered by Alex 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't vote for her the last two times she was in the white house, I wouldn't vote for her now. The last time a Clinton was in office the United States was the weakest we have ever been and it showed to our enemies. Thankfully we have a president that understands we need to go after the terrorists and there suppliers in there own back yards. Hopefully the bleeding hearts wont get there way. As far as the cheating that is between them and God.
2007-01-24 23:36:20 · answer #3 · answered by Gremlin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think i could. but, i guess since i won't vote for such a "bright woman", i'm part of that so called vast right wing conspiracy.
2007-01-24 23:14:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Says it or creates it? I think it's amazing that people actually bought it, too.
I get this mental picture of Bush sneaking Monica in through the tunnel entrance.
Stands by her man? How about writes the script. We all know who put Monica in the White House. Hillary.
2007-01-24 23:13:48 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton.
As for the rest of what you said, I agree with the first post, that's pretty weak. Attack Whitewater, or "The Great Hillary-Care Disaster of 1993"
2007-01-24 23:16:52 · answer #6 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm voting Bugs Bunny '08, so I couldn't care less about Hillary, Obama, McCain, or any of the rest of those partisan fartknockers..
2007-01-24 23:13:23 · answer #7 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Holy cow she really must be a serious threat the the republican party if people on the republican side keep jumping on her. Might be that she was spoke after the state of the Union address she might have had some good ideas the republicans missed on the war in Iraq!!
2007-01-24 23:15:38 · answer #8 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Keep an open mind.
Hillary is looking and sounding very good so far in this campaign.
2007-01-24 23:30:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly would given that we have been strapped by Mickey Mouse for 8 years, ANYONE will do.
2007-01-25 03:49:50 · answer #10 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋