English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was just reading some answers and one person had a baby at five years old and another said six. I find this very hard to believe becuse I may be young and curoiouse but I am not stupid. I know the requirment for a girl to become pregnate and I highly dougbt a five year old would have a mature enough body to even concive please someone seriouse and someone who will not make fun of me correct me or confirm my theory!

2007-01-24 14:56:56 · 29 answers · asked by perpetaully sarcastic 3 in Pregnancy & Parenting Adolescent

29 answers

5 is the record youngest for a girl to give birth.

2007-01-24 15:02:34 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Me 3 · 4 0

Well I'm not exactly certain about the people who made the comments, but I have heard about three girls who were recorded to have given birth at like 9, 7 and even 5 respectively and medically speaking it is possible, just the frequency of occurrence isn't highly probable. Girls enter puberty at various ages and if a child's menarch occurs at 5 or 6 and she has sex (rather is molested by a sick pervert) then she can very well have a child. One that I heard of in school was Lina Medina from Peru who gave birth at 5 years old (in the 1930s). The other was 9. There's actually quite a bit of literature on them, however I can't remember the story of the other girl. These stories are so sad.

2007-01-24 15:10:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

There are some studies out about Soy and Soy products. One of the findings: "Preliminary studies are indicating that children given soy formula go through puberty much earlier than children who were not fed soy products. Why? Because the phytoestrogens/ isoflavones in soy act like a hormone in the body, causing the infant to have hormones like the adult body."

"In 1982 pediatric endocrinologists reported that their studies indicated an increase in the incidence of breast development in girls younger than eight years of age. In the first study of 130 little girls, 68% of them had the onset of thelarche (breast development) before they were 18 months old!"

Now five or six may seem young, but I have a second cousin that started her period when she was 8 years old. So if they can start that young they can get pregnant that young (if molested, etc.).

"Little girls that go through puberty early face a greater lifetime risk of breast cancer and early ovarian cysts, which is a factor in ovarian cancer and of developing autoimmune thyroid disease (ATD)."

also, for boys: “Early puberty (caused by consuming soy products) may increase a boy’s chances of developing testicular cancer later in life, because it means longer exposure to sex hormones,”

For more info, go to http://www.nogreaterjoy.org and do a search for "Soy Alert". I would put the address here, but it never works for me, too long maybe.

2007-01-24 15:20:34 · answer #3 · answered by diamond8784 3 · 0 0

When my sister was in Kindergarten she had a friend that had a weird medical condition so at 4 she had her period, grew breasts, etc. It was really unhealthy because it was affecting her growth and such. Technically, at 4, if she had been raped she could have had a child at 5.

It is sad and she grew up to have severe bone problems, hormone issues, and was psychologically damage from having to worry about her breasts and wearing pads from such a young age. Unfortuantely I am going to have to dismiss your ideas that a girl cannot have a baby at 5.

2007-01-24 23:23:50 · answer #4 · answered by bpbjess 5 · 0 0

The youngest girl ever recorded to be pregnant was 9 years old. this was very unusual. Think about it, a 5 year old is barely beyond being a baby herself.World's Youngest Pregnancy: 9-year-old Girl » ....
www.shoutwire.com/comments/19031/World_s_Youngest_Pregnancy_9_year_old_Girl - 53k - Cached - Similar pages

2007-01-24 15:17:19 · answer #5 · answered by pawnyourhearttome 2 · 0 1

Yeah... sperm can stay on your physique for as much as 5 days.... Why might human beings at the instant no longer shelter them selves? Are human beings nonetheless naive appropriate to the actuality that there are further and further human beings contracting and spreading STDs with out even understanding it? USE YOUR HEAD human beings!

2016-12-12 19:42:10 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

actually it's true. there was a young girl that was 5 years old when she gave birth to a child. she had some rare condition that caused her to have the reproductive organs of a fully adult female. i want to say she was from Bulgaria or somewhere like that, but i'm not sure.

2007-01-24 15:00:48 · answer #7 · answered by redpeach_mi 7 · 6 0

No you are right. Also since there is no way for a 5 year old to have her period that also makes it impossible. They're just looking for attention.

2007-01-25 05:47:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually it is true. She was 5. She developed early. They never knew who the father was but they did think it was her dad. SO.. she wasn't mentally ready but sometimes people don't give other people the option. Here is a link for you with a picture of her pregnant. Hope it helps.

http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/medina.asp

2007-01-24 15:03:46 · answer #9 · answered by Mrs. Always Right 5 · 4 0

I woman's 'eggs' will not be able to be fertilized at such a young age, unless she reached her puberty at that age.

Although a man at any age is able to impregnant a woman, a woman is not able to get pregnate until puberty.

2007-01-24 19:21:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers