English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what i mean is that i'm 21. my unmarried best friend just had her 2nd kid and it seems like shes living the life. she's on medicaid, gets food stamps, has no job, pays $30.00 a month in rent in our family housing projects in town, and gets a huge amount of tax refund. meanwhile i'm busting my a** going to school full time, working 32 hrs a week just so i can give all my paycheck to tuition, books, bills and i have to pay 75.00 a month for crappy insurance. sometime it seems easier just to pop out a kid and reap all the benefits. yes, there are those who need help but what about struggling responsible college kids barely making it. just because i was responsible and kept my legs closed i cant get any help from the government. does anyone agree with me? i wish i could make my own financial fund program just for full time students out there.

2007-01-24 14:24:39 · 7 answers · asked by n_need_of_help 2 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

I agree with you fully. Just know that you're doing the responsible thing, and your life will be so much better than hers in the long run. Hang in there hon! You'll never have to be a welfare bum.

2007-01-24 14:28:45 · answer #1 · answered by shojo 6 · 0 0

maybe your answer is abortion for those undesirable pregnancies? compelled abortion, even? i'm and adoptive determine. till you're, then you definitely've probably performed no longer something to help any of the toddlers who would be raised in poverty because it is, and in squalor in case you have your way. As a instructor, I observed on a daily basis the outcomes to toddlers of the particularly stupid movements and opportunities of the dad and mom. you may not be professional-existence formerly the youngster passes interior the direction of the cervix and not have some compassion for the toddlers AFTER the delivery technique is complete. whilst I agree thoroughly that some human beings shouldn't reproduce, i'm no longer keen to punish the youngster for the stupidity of the dad and mom. regrettably, increasing the month-to-month fee to the determine to disguise the greater advantageous value of raising the further new child is the only way obtainable to work out that the youngster is cared for with the gadget we've. further as an edit after analyzing a number of the different solutions - actual, i became involved with putting a pair of my pupils on some sort of delivery administration that she could no longer forget to soak up order to avert being pregnant. although, as a libertarian, I knew that slippery slope became one i could opt to stay off of. a similar with removing toddlers from the abode - confident, it particularly is the absolute cleanest answer, yet regrettably adoption, to no longer point out foster care, has its very own set of issues. the nice and comfortable button is there is no "undemanding" treatment for systemic and cultural issues.

2016-11-01 05:23:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because we're in a Christian based society, and as Christian based, the government supports the growth of families.

2007-01-24 14:32:27 · answer #3 · answered by herbritannicmajesty68 3 · 0 0

you have a future. There will come a time when you will be making much more money and have your own professional job..maybe even a home. this is as good as it gets for your friend. this is how it will always be.

2007-01-24 14:31:43 · answer #4 · answered by copestir 7 · 0 0

uhh...there are plenty of government funded tuition scholarships and grants. and if you're a full time student, you should be getting all of your refund back

2007-01-24 14:30:44 · answer #5 · answered by megansa0811 2 · 0 0

college tuition's are controlled by big business , unlike government " handouts "

2007-01-24 14:29:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

so they can grow up and pay taxes

2007-01-24 14:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by technicanb 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers