isnt it a bit irresponsible for us gay people to adopt children?

Question

not because of us but because of the society the child will have to live in. Imagine the child will have to face people like the one below my question who will point at them and make fun of them just because they disagree with him/her having two fathers/mothers.

Answer 1

Kids are going to get teased no matter what they do and no matter what their parents do. Some kids get teased because they're fat, some kids get teased because they talk funny, and some kids get teased because they have two mommies. As long as they have a good loving family to go home to, it doesn't matter.

Answer 2

Not really.

Yes, all else being equal it is certainly better for a child to have a loving Father AND Mother.

But if the child is up for adoption, already all else is not equal. Some children have no Father or no Mother, the child up for adoption has neither. Better they should have TWO loving parents.

Yes, the child is bound to have trouble with from others who tease and taunt him/her. But is it because the parents are not loving their child or is it because there are idiots in out society? Think about it.

Answer 3

I understand your question, but I will have to say no. Is it irresponsible for minorities to have children, despite lingering prejudices? How about low-income families? You get the point... The saddest thing of all is when people have kids and don't love them as they should. I think a gay couple that gives their child the love, respect, and consideration that every child deserves is already doing a better job of parenting than the average traditional nuclear family today.

Answer 4

I think that gay couples who want to adopt children should. 25 years ago, high school couples of different races and/or ethnic groups were advised to break up before running the risk of having mixed-race children. The idea was that people would be unkind to these children! It didn't turn out that way. Society changes over time. Also, some children will be ridiculed because of other characterstics that their parents have. But what's really important is that children have parents who love them and parent them well. The worst thing is for children to grow up without permanent families.

Answer 5

honestly gays should be able to undertake! i become raised by technique of a lesbian couple and they were the most acceptable mothers and fathers ever!!!!! They were very loving and helping mothers and fathers. They gave me an truly effective, strong abode existence. They took me in at the same time as no one else might want to. If it wasnt for them i might want to were an orphan. I owe them each and every thing! and that i did have a 'classic' kinfolk, 2 loving mothers and fathers, a spectacular abode, pets, a strong preparation, acquaintances, kinfolk vacation trips, tremendous vacation journeys you call it and it become an same or often extra effective than what my acquaintances had. So what in the adventure that they both befell to be woman! i imagine they did an truly good pastime raising a effective member of society. i'm a accountable valuable youthful agency and residential proprietor, i'm in an truly chuffed and healthy lengthy time period dedicated relationship, I do a lot of volunteer artwork and substances decrease back to my community and perchance maximum significantly i become fortunate sufficient to benefit by technique of party from an truly youthful age that popularity and tolerance of others is the major to a contented and healthy international. ***EDIT*** I stay in Florida, a state the position that is unlawful for homosexuals to undertake children yet they are allowed to be foster mothers and fathers. What the hell is that about? in accordance to The State of Florida homosexuals are strong sufficient to briefly look after a baby yet at the same time as it includes honestly giving that child a loving everlasting abode the position they could finally experience like they belong that's 'hell no! which will be terrible!' Are you kidding me? extra then some thing children want stability that in user-friendly words a loving and everlasting abode can provide them and a gay or lesbian couple can provide that merely as well as a instantly couple can!

Answer 6

I am always surprised to hear gay people tell me that they wouldn't have children because it would be difficult on the child. This opinion from individuals that have unfairly been judged in society says plenty. Many gay people have a greater need to protect a child from ridicule than to prove to society that they can be great parents.

I think that there are plenty of children in foster homes and orphanages that need a loving home. I know homosexuals, like I know heterosexuals, that would make good parents.

We live in a world where gay people are viewed upon as unstable. I know many gay professionals who have had the same partner for many many years. They are your average person, except they happen to be gay.

I am not going to lie. I definitely think that we live in a world where children are still ridiculed for being children of gay parents, and life would be much easier if a child lived in a 'loving' heterosexual home in this society, but I think we should consider whether we would want children to live their lives without knowing what it feels like to belong to a family before we jump in to insist that gay loving couples aren't worthy of being parents.

Answer 7

I think adopting a child and bringing them up in that kind of enviroment is a great idea. They will learn to tolerate other people for there difference. And its not like they are all gonna turn out gay or anything, if i had a son and he grew up found a wonderful women i would be happy for them as much as i would if he was gay.
I think that child put in this situation will come out alot tougher then most, cos they would have had to deal with getting teased and whatever. But all kids get teased. theres no doubting that

Answer 8

You have a very strong argument...Although I believe that a child can go through a lot by people as it is without having gay parents.I went through hell growing up cause of irresponsible straight parents.My partner and I think about having children in a very conservative and religious society.I believe that all depends on the the bases that we will give to our kids so that they will be able to overcome the difficulties!And of course we can always hope for things to change!It it the 21st century for God's sake!

Answer 9

Actually it's the most responsible thing we could do.
The irresponsibility lies with the people who have children they neither want nor are able to properly care for.
Children need a loving home no matter who is at the head of it so long as it is a loving and nurturing place in which they can thrive.
Many gay couple provide this and should be commended for their contribution to society and humanity as a whole.

Answer 10

Society has changed dramatically in my life so far. It will continue to do so. The irresponsibility would be in leaving the child to be reared in foster homes or in orphanages. Better a stable (if slightly unconventional) environment, than no stable environment.

Answer 11

If the child is loved, the fact he/she is being taunted will not matter. If the child is loved by his two mothers or two fathers then a stupid thing like the scenario you describe will mean nothing.