wouldn't we all be happy? and if u could only trade a little things instead of give paper to "buy" things? i wonder how it would be without those paper money....or wutever it is made of.
2007-01-24 13:17:07 · 8 answers · asked by Legant 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Would we all be happy without money and power? Sure, if you don't mind raising chickens to trade with the guy that raises wheat and makes bicycles. As long as you don't mind the utter chaos and anarchy that would ensue if there was absoutely no power structure. As long as you don't mind pure darwinism where the strong will survive and the weak will die off. For instance, computer geeks are necessary in our current system because we need our technology to work. If we had no money, there would be no use for them, and the foot ball players would subjugate 'geeky' type people and take their food, water and shelter.
Ever watched about 20 or 30 kids on a playground - or one of those little play areas in the mall? Utter chaos, no structure, no Idea about wealth, power or money. That is the type of cluster f*ck I am talking about. Everyone milling around, wondering what to do next, and doing their own thing, with no efficency or effectivness.
Think about this a little further...
2007-01-31 10:06:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a international with out faith many times, or God particularly, could purely be a international of remember and capacity. Happiness and distinctive subject concerns we value are actual no longer real or lasting or important in a international like that. in spite of could ensue might desire to be reason and result reactions. there is no value in that. For there to be true love, value or happiness there might desire to be some concern greater helpful than ourselves obtainable. the author Francis Schaeffer talked at length approximately this occasion. See the books "he's There and he isn't Silent" and "The God who's There." with out or with faith we gained't have a happy international. Sin entered the international by guy's option to seek for and look after his happiness supremely, unintelligently supposing it to be of optimal value. each and every and each human beings in turn do the same element till at last we elect for to stay for God and others. you're precise , diverse perspectives do create chaos, yet selfishness and self-centeredness might desire to be closer to the inspiration concern. stable day
2016-11-01 05:16:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would be fewer people as there was before money became (mainstream). for example, when the barter and trade system was in place our families were smaller and smarter about how to take care of themselves. But it can't all be taken away at once... pandimonium would ensue.
2007-02-01 09:21:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you took money away now it would be hell on earth most would starve or freeze to death or the big guy would take what little food you do have . Money,s not a bad thing its the people with all the money that's bad.
2007-01-31 09:50:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Power abhors a vacuum. So there would always be power, even if it's by committee.
As for money, it's been tried ....before currency was invented. It did not make people any happier than they are now ...it actually made their life harder.
2007-01-31 15:38:56 · answer #5 · answered by McDreamy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money is power.
Its hard to know whatt the world would be like without it, or if it would function at all.
Wouldn't we as humans find something else to fight over?
2007-01-31 22:43:59 · answer #6 · answered by sylvia a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that will happen i Heaven..
world is world, without power and money, we'll DIE
2007-01-24 13:22:26 · answer #7 · answered by wEnNy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ideal!!
2007-01-24 13:29:24 · answer #8 · answered by fresch2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋