English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

*this is not my question




























Is it not inherently desired to want to engage use of your genitalia with the genitalia of the opposite gender?

If so, then does it not prove that all people are heterosexually bound.

And before you answer "what about anal sex" isn't the anus just a substitution for the vagina in homosexual relationships between men, similarly a woman's fingers or tongue are the same substitution.

Therefore the only true bond a homosexual could have for someone of the same gender would be their personality or body, which means they probably aren't looking hard enough among the opposite gender, plenty of feminine men and masculine women for them or they should just be friends.

I suppose fear of approaching the opposite gender could be a reason too but this fear is clearly a mental problem that could be overcome.

2007-01-24 12:32:09 · 3 answers · asked by Jett 1 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

3 answers

1) Why the deceptive question?
2) No, it is not inherently desired to be with the opposite gender.
3) No, not all people are heterosexually bound.
4) Homosexuality is about more than same gender sex.
5) Homosexuality is not caused by a fear of approaching the opposite gender and it is not a mental problem.

I suppose you are talking about something you will never understand and have no interest in understanding. So why post the non-question question at all?

2007-01-28 05:07:04 · answer #1 · answered by Spyder 5 · 0 0

Well, the attraction to the opposite sex is inherent in my case but I don't see why my situation should be a universal norm. Then again I also enjoy heterosexual anal sex so my example might not be representative. I am inclined to think that "love" as a concept must certainly extend beyond mere physical attraction and a sexual coupling likely to reproduce the species and I don't believe that "love" is incapable of existing, as would be the case with your definition, in a homosexual relationship.

2007-01-26 09:31:58 · answer #2 · answered by Barb S 3 · 0 0

Right on.

2007-01-24 20:36:11 · answer #3 · answered by Holly Marie 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers