English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ok say scientist found a neat safe way to live on mars without a spacesuit or a helmet or an oxygen tank and you had the oppertunity to be the first to live on mars , would you do it ??????????????????

2007-01-24 10:42:04 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

9 answers

Yep...it would be an adventure. I could probably to some great rock climbing!

2007-01-24 10:50:10 · answer #1 · answered by P K 3 · 0 0

there is already a way you can live on mars. listen send a man with the materials to make his own indoor green house. he can grow his own food amd make his on water from the left over polar caps on mars. put him close enough to the caps and all he has to do is build a shelter and start his own life from seeds that he brang form earth . you will have the problem of contamination but is't that what humans are already doing to earth any how. melt the left over ice in a heat enviroment. ice makes water there for life can thrive any where there is water that is what most things are made of any way. plus if you have ever heard of hydroponics you can extract chemicals from the existing soil that you need do produce every thing you wopuld need

2007-01-24 12:03:07 · answer #2 · answered by Joe s 1 · 0 0

Already been there done that there was a half dozen base camps usaly we had glass bubles large enough or condenmedium size for 12 to 15 people. I think 3 of them exploded from rock hits or some other failure.

2007-01-24 13:39:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, I was waiting for someone to ask this question so I could tell the world that I would love to. It is actually my dream to explore every single planet safely.

2007-01-24 10:52:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

confident, there are severe tries being made, albeit by using purely a small kind of scientists. nonetheless, as our expertise of the innermost workings of biology has skyrocketed, the concept a "therapy" for ageing must be got here across is now being taken heavily. As for a manner long it ought to take, this is an argument of discussion. the vast restricting factor, say, 10 or 2 many years in the past became our loss of expertise of all the strategies that reason ageing. Now, the restricting factor is investment and manpower. you may understand that human lifespan has been increasing slowly over the years. 2000 years in the past the common lifespan became slightly 30. one hundred years in the past, you need to assume to stay to, say, 50 or 60. in recent times, 80 is lifelike in case you're looking after your self. What diverse human beings don't understand, however, is that no longer purely is regularly occurring lifespan increasing, however the _rate_ at which it particularly is increasing, is likewise increasing. this means that while one hundred years in the past the common lifespan became increasing by using some days according to annum, that's at the instant increasing at approximately 3 months according to year. In different words, according to annum the common lifespan will strengthen by using a million/4 of a year. Now, something very exciting will ensue interior the destiny. while the upward thrust in regularly occurring lifespan reaches a million year according to year, which skill you may assume to stay a year longer according to annum. In different words, you have in simple terms conquered ageing, simply by fact the common lifetime age will continuously be greater advantageous than your age from then on. The technical term for it is "actuarial get away speed." technology and drugs would be waiting to therapy what ails you (at the same time with ageing) in the previous what ails you may kill you. save in mind that in spite of if we can therapy ageing sooner or later, this might nonetheless no longer be "genuine" immortality. you need to doubtlessly stay perpetually, even though it might additionally nonetheless be obtainable to get killed by using twist of destiny, homicide, or organic disaster. nonetheless, i might choose to stay for as long as i ought to, in no way having to stress approximately dying of affliction or previous age. once you have an interest in examining greater approximately scientific efforts to stay perpetually (or as on the factor of it as we can), examine your community library or bookshop for the books decrease than.

2016-12-12 19:34:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES!!!!!!!! i would to be one of the first to help colonize a planet.

2007-01-24 13:57:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO too far from home for me.

2007-01-24 11:20:12 · answer #7 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 0

that would be so awesome

2007-01-24 10:50:19 · answer #8 · answered by tubafreak911 2 · 0 0

Yes. May I bring a friend please?

2007-01-24 11:52:53 · answer #9 · answered by Otis F 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers