2007-01-24 10:40:37 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
OK, I admit it, I was not precise enough with my wording. Touche' to all who got me.
2007-01-24 10:50:51 · update #1
You are right Ken, Wolf Blitzer is very arrogant
2007-01-24 10:47:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Wolf Blitzer
2007-01-24 10:44:34 · answer #2 · answered by DAVAY 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Wolf Blitzer gets paid "special benefits" by the Democrat National Committee.
2007-01-24 10:47:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Israel has a huge and effective foyer that no longer in user-friendly terms controls some in Washington yet additionally controls some interior the media. together as I often think of Senator Paul is an fool, I ensue to consider him right here. the main difficulty is that we are discussing an truly, very small factor of finished federal costs while we are speaking approximately remote places help. shall we decrease all remote places help and nonetheless have a multi-trillion greenback funds deficit. Republicans and Democrats the two ought to reign in military spending and reorganize extensive entitlement courses like social secure practices and medicare in the event that they are severe approximately balancing the funds. this won't in any respect be ordinary or customary.
2016-11-26 23:59:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah Jabba the Hastert
2007-01-24 10:44:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Blitzer is a pain in the @ss. You're right.
2007-01-24 10:45:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I never do name calling, especially public officials, but to see a short summary of the speech - see my question, which is seven questions after yours.
2007-01-24 11:40:54 · answer #7 · answered by oatie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are talking about Blitzer...right? If so, no, never saw the like.
2007-01-24 10:45:20 · answer #8 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I seem to remember one finger waggling arrogant SOB that swore he did not have sexual relations....and asked what the meaning of is, is.
2007-01-24 12:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by rmoss9686 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have not seen that tape yet, but I don't doubt it. By any chance did you see the smirk on his face last night right after Bush mentioned alternative fuels? That was quite telling. I'm sure every rightie was to busy hating Pelosi to notice that.
2007-01-24 10:49:54 · answer #10 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋