Is the information in loose change correct? If so which parts are true and which are false?

Question

I just watched it and i don't know what to believe now, can someone help me out

Answer 1

I wasn't that impressed with "Loose Change", try watching "In Plane Sight", it will make you think and ask questions that should be asked.


http://video.google.com/url?vidurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2Fvideoplay%3Fdocid%3D-8585976043115686394%26q%3Din%2Bplane%2Bsite&docid=-8585976043115686394&ev=v&esrc=sr1&usg=AL29H20bqUrW-_QEi2VocJyXn-Pwe-LaSw

Check this link to a radio station interview with Popular Mechanics' Davin Coburn,"researcher, editor, reporter on the original 9/11 article" cluelessly trying to defend their weak debunking of Loose Change: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060826165457842

Answer 2

here, i've been working on this... please let me know what your questions are so i can put them in too. i need to watch it again so it's better organized, but it's a start.

i see someone negged me already... what is wrong with anything i've said? the evidence in those shows does not exist, when they describe a vanished plane they are being intellectually dishonest. for example, where are the thousands of people who saw the plane fly over the freeway? the ones who know it wasn't a jetliner? there aren't any! everyone i've ever seen does say a plane hit the pentagon. a passenger plane. with no magic missile attachments. i would like to see what you folks find compelling so i can address it, but the information in loose change and in plane site is practically meaningless...

i've never heard anyone say the plane was "vaporised". here's what may have happened though...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

rebuts rolls royce quote and shows additional engine parts ignored in film:
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml

"The article describes John Brown as a spokesman for Rolls-Royce in Indianapolis, Indiana. This location is home to the Allison Engine factory that builds the AE3007H turbofan used aboard the Global Hawk. Brown's quote regarding the mystery wreckage states that, "It is not a part from any Rolls Royce engine that I'm familiar with, and certainly not the AE 3007H made here in Indy." Furthermore, the article correctly notes that the RB211 is not built in Indianapolis but at the Rolls-Royce plant in Derby, England. Since Brown is a spokesman for Allison Engines, which was an independent company that only became a subsidary of Rolls-Royce in 1995, it stands to reason that an engine built in the United Kingdom would be one he's not "familiar with." The article even goes on to point out that Brown could not identify specific parts from one engine or another since he is not an engineer or assembly line technician who would be familiar with the internal components of turbine engines."

hermetically sealed elevators:
http://www.rd.com/content/openContent.do?contentId=27619

Lauren still remembers lying in the brilliant sunshine on the grass median outside the World Trade Center in unspeakable pain -- yet "seeing every blade of grass with razor precision," she says. Walking into the north tower, unaware that a plane had struck, she had been engulfed by a fireball as jet fuel poured down an elevator shaft and exploded. On her back in the midst of the horror, debris raining down around her, Lauren made the decision to live -- for Greg and for Tyler, then 10 months old.

and passports are made of super strong materials! who knew?

"A passport belonging to Lidle, an avid pilot who got his flying license after last year's offseason, was reportedly found on the street below the crash site."

in plane sight is also a load.

Answer 3

The fact that they looked up so many sources makes it seem real legit to me. The news videos were from widespread videos and all of the major news stations and the phyics that they used is 100% correct. The only thing you should look up is the statements they used from the different people. Otherwise it is all quite plausible.

Answer 4

You have to make your own mind up about that. There is alot of info. I suggest watching it again and maybe even look at other opionions too.

Answer 5

A lot of it is contrived. It's best to arm yourself with facts, not guesses.

http://stj911.org/index.html

If you have a few hours and the ability to objectively analyze, then you will find this site most interesting.

Answer 6

Popular Mechanics debunked their claims. I'd trust Popular Mechanics before a group no one had ever heard of until after 9/11, but that's just my opinion.

Answer 7

It's all true, brother.