Why would a democracy in Iraq be good for us? I'm willing to agree that given an educated and informed?

Question

electorate and the ability to ensure fair and free elections democracy would be good for them. But what is to keep the Iraqis from voting to develop WMDs and bomb the US? Isn't this a war against terrorism? Being allowed to vote doesn't automatically make everybody good.

Answer 1

There's nothing to keep them from doing that. Whether or not you believe that Saddam's government was harboring WMD's, you can't deny that he refused to allow UN inspection teams full access, which certainly raises suspicions. Should the new government do the same, they would be subject to the same processes of diplomacy, sanctions, etc.

The hallmark of a democracy is a system of checks and balances. In a democracy, the diversity of power serves to create an environment in which idealistically anti-American forces would be shut down by either pro-American or pro-peace factions.

When the US left Iraq after Desert Storm, we were criticized for leaving the people there to the Butcher of Baghdad. The same people who criticized us for leaving then are pushing us to leave now. Make no mistake, the war in Iraq is an ethnic war. So why do those who say we should stop ethnic cleansing in other parts of the world encourage us to leave Iraq so the ethnic cleansing can continue--albeit a bit more balanced fight.

I'll make the same argument about Darfur. If we go into Darfur and stop the government there from slaying its people, then what's to stop the new government there from turning on the US?

Nothing. The problem with politics and war is that you're dealing with people, and without a license to be absolutely ruthless, one can never be entirely sure of the outcome.

Answer 2

First you must look at the causes of terrorism. The main cause of terrorism is no education, yes the terrorist leaders are highly educated, but their followers are not. It is likely that an Iraqi populace that is free, will be less likely to listen to radical muslims, because with democracy comes education, economic prosperity, and civil liberties. Something the Arab world lacks at the moment, and that is why there is an abundance of Islamic extremists.

Answer 3

Assuming we don't bypass away to early, Iraq would be basically fantastic. Iran will attempt to reason some worry, yet with i think of which would be ok to boot, because of the fact that Iran has its very own problems. they'll nonetheless be an Islamic state, and that for the period of its very own spectacular isn't a difficulty. they'll perform a little issues we don't love, and a few we do. yet to additionally remark on somebody else's answer, we gave them the window, yet they have taken democracy, that risked their lives to vote, in 3 different elections. This new government is the 1st one that easily looks to decide to do something on their very own, particularly of sitting quietly at the back of us. to respond to returned to another lame remark I examine France became occupied by skill of the Germans the Germans have been occupied by skill individuals. We have been occupied by skill of the British Israel became occupied by skill of the Romans England became occupied by skill of the Saxons want i bypass on?

Answer 4

It is assumed that free Iraqis would desire to live in peace and this desire would make them elect a government that would insure peace. It is also assumed that a free Iraq could only have a positive influence on the surrounding countries making it a more stable region.

Answer 5

We would want a democracy over there so that we can have a nice buddy in the middle of the middle east to base future operations out of.

Answer 6

Good point.
People do sometimes vote for evil.
That's what happened on Nov 7, when the Democrats took over Congress.

Answer 7

No two democracies have ever been at war with each other.