Which one took our country out of debt and which one put our country so far in debt we will never get out. Which one believes in peace and which one believes in war.
2007-01-24 08:23:56 · 15 answers · asked by Lou 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
CLINTON ANYDAY!!!!
2007-01-24 08:31:16 · answer #1 · answered by brandi91082 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well, I would say they are both for peace. Second, when has this country ever been out of debt? Third, Clinton kept letting this country get punched in the face by terrorists (USS Cole, World Trade Center 1993, and 2 US Embassies). Bush had the nerve to stand up and keep them from slapping us again. This has nothing to do with supporters being brainwashed or blindly led into believing in this war. This is what supporters voted him in for, they want someone in office that is determined to win this thing and he's doing just that.
2007-01-24 16:45:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah, Clinton believed in peace so much that he virtually ignored terrorism for eight years, insuring the successful annihilation of 3000 Americans on 9/11.
What a wonderful legacy for the boy president.
2007-01-24 16:33:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush! But if you're asking about Hillary/Bill, I think Hillary is way worse than her husband. She has a real problem with stay at home moms and women who don't work. I'll never forget her Tammy Wynette speech. She always seems to be seething and ready to start screaming.
Bill, had some major flaws, but he introduced some programs and welfare cutbacks that were very insightful. I guess it comes from being raised in Arkansas, like myself. The damage of being raised on welfare and making it a lifetime choice has damaged the south. That's a different story, tho. Sorry
2007-01-24 16:38:09 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Clinton, although I'm not so sure that Hillary believes in peace.
Hillary is a war-hawk and she has accepted money from Rupert Murdoch, so I really do not trust her, but I definitely trust her over anyone in the Bush family.
2007-01-24 16:32:26 · answer #5 · answered by ghostwriter 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
AFAIK, there isn't another Bush running for President. I haven't heard about Jeb or anyone else running, so you've got a problem with your question, unless you have proof to back up that part of your question.
2007-01-24 17:55:27 · answer #6 · answered by ldnester 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ideally I'd like to see Barack Obama as pres and Hillary as VP. That way there's a fresh politician with a seasoned and competent one to back him up.
I'd never vote for a Bush, personally.
2007-01-24 16:35:44 · answer #7 · answered by meanjanine 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i would pick another clinton. bush needs to keep out of politics. everyone thinks he did such a good job as president, but in all actuality he really didnt, he sent us to war. many innocent lives were taken. i would gladly vote for another clinton
2007-01-24 16:33:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes to Clinton (I'll be voting for Hillary:-)...
Down with Bush
2007-01-24 16:31:46 · answer #9 · answered by foodie 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
bush yes..clinton no....which one is trying to spread freedom and democracy..??? which one sold our secrets to china..??? id rather be despised and strong and in charge, than weak, blackmailed and beholden to other countries that hate us...the money means nothing without freedom...
2007-01-24 16:34:10 · answer #10 · answered by badjanssen 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush.
If Clinton did his job, there would not be a war.
2007-01-24 16:31:58 · answer #11 · answered by Quickie 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋