Why do the democrats want us to lose in Iraq?

Answer 1

To make the Republicans look bad so the Dems can have Congress and the White House for the next 20 years.

FORGET IT, DEMS. YOU ARE NOT GONNA LAST 2 YEARS!

YOU WATCH...

Answer 2

Your question makes assumptions that I do not feel are correct. From the position papers and proposals I have seen from leading Democrats from Rep. John Murtha to Dennis Kucinch, their priorities are to stabilize the area, allowing the Iraqis to settle their disputes. Rep. Murtha suggests that we simply move our troops to nearby areas where they can be "on call" as it were in case the Iraqi government finds it needs extra help. Rep. Kucinich's plan is to use UN troops to help stabilize the area, so that the burden (and expense) isn't solely upon the US. Since a majority of the members of the coalition have left or plan to leave within the next year, something different needs to be done.

What has occurred so far has merely destabilized the area and, if anything, created more anti-Western terrorists. I would kindly remind you that President Bush is responsible for this policy. If his goals have been to create a stable, democratic Iraq and stop fundamentalist recruiting of people to become terrorists, his policies have failed. What the Democrats are proposing is a way to get out of the quagmire that Bush has created before our armed forces are broken and our treasury completely depleted.

Answer 3

Why do you ask the same question everyday? The answer is: Democrats Do Not Want Us To Lose In Iraq.

Answer 4

the reality is when we pull out even if that is in 6 months or 10 years they are going to bypass decrease back to what they recognize maximum acceptable and for this reason we are able to not in any respect change them to our thoughts. seem at Vietnam and also you'd be searching at a mirror of what's going to happen. So the authentic question is do you want to waste any extra of the tax payers money on some thing which will not in any respect happen. certain, many Iraq human beings state that is tremendous we are there notwithstanding that is trouble-free to appreciate that in a rustic the position speaking their innovations has gotten them killed they worry in the adventure that they communicate adverse to us we are able to kill them as well. i do not say i want the Iraq authorities to hotel decrease back to the way they were yet merely that it's going to happen no count number what we want. for sure the Republicans will blame it on us leaving. they are going to not in any respect recognize what might want to have befell in the adventure that they stayed because the subsequent president is going to be a democrat.

Answer 5

The question might have validity if you could define the opposite of "lose". If you mean "win", my question would be to define what "winning" in Iraq would be like. I don't think we can "win" in Iraq, there's nobody to defeat. If we were to pull out now, what is the difference that you think would happen as opposed to our pulling out 2 years from now? The Sunnis and Shiites have been fighting each other for 500 years. Why should they listen to American reasoning when we don't even believe in their version of God? Democrats don't want to "lose" any more than Republicans.

Answer 6

Back to the Viet Nam play book just want to relive those days of helicopter flying off the embassy roof. Let's all sing, "Give Peace A Chance"

Answer 7

We don't want to lose, but Bush and Cheney already lost it-from the beginning. We don't mind saying its time to leave, because we don't want our soldiers dying for nothing. The reason those fools blind-sided us to go to Iraq was because that dumbass had a vendetta against Sadam, because Sadam tried to kill daddy. It also was good for that rotten old c*nt Cheney's stocks in Halliburton.

Also, we have the BALLS to speak out. Wanna see mine so you'll know what a pair look like?!

Answer 8

There's nothing to win in Iraq, except their oil. How could anything be called a victory now that thousands have been killed and hundreds of billions flushed? Bush sent America trespassing there on a gigantic WMD lie, he shock and awed the place to rubble and started a civil war, it's not the democrat's responsibility to fix it. It's foolish to throw more good money and lives into a bad situation. Bush wants to bully the world, it's no wonder they fight back.

Answer 9

They think the war is lost, or not worth fighting, or both because they don't understand the consequences of defeat. It would prove that we are a lousy friend to have and not a threat as an enemy, and that we are not willing to back up our talk with actions.

If we are unwilling to suffer casualties in a military operation, we might as well disband our military.

Everyone in the world - our potential allies and our potential enemies - is watching us very closely, and will act accordingly.

Democrats don't understand that many, many more Americans will die in the long run if we "stop the war" now.

Answer 10

Where is bin Forgotten??... Bush did not catch him... Bush is a crazy man that will go down in history as one of the worst presidents

Answer 11

We're already losing thanks to Bush's intelligence and brilliant leadership. Democrats just want to cut our losses. Over 3,000 troops and countless of thousands of Iraqi citizens have died since Bush's pompous victory speech on an aircraft carrier almost 4 years ago. If 5,000 or 10,000 troops die in Iraq, does it make us any safer? Does it eradicate terrorism? Why should it be our mission to bring democracy to a nation that does not welcome it or cannot handle it?