Some say he isn't a criminal, that he's as pure as newly fallen snow. Others say he needs to be put on trial for crimes against humanity and treason, what say you?
2007-01-24 07:05:15 · 23 answers · asked by Resurrected 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is the response that John McCain gave to the Bush State of the Union speech...."YAWN" You need to see this, it's very pertinent to the cause. Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/01/24/08-war-candidate-mccain-_n_39483.html
Bush over shadows Richard Nixon, and I thought that couldn't be accomplished in my life time. The Enron scandal is one thing he has done that would put him away for life. I am really amazed at the multiple response to this question that has the same content for an answer, I think there is a collective mind working on this page, or say a multiple profile propagandist. Will they ever stop the madness!!!!
2007-01-24 07:17:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 14⤊ 4⤋
No evidence? Wow! the individuals who say there is not any evidence have their heads up their a$$e$! there has been hundreds of courtroom situations suggested on actual info that shows Bush is a bloodthirsty piece of **** and a traitor. Why didnt he get charged? govt PRIVILEGE! "You cant fee the President of the U. S. for against the regulation!" properly now hes no longer president anymore and his buddy Obama who works for an identical human beings (Bilderburg team, Council on distant places family members, and so on.) says that he would not even ought to cover at the back of govt privilege simply by fact Obama can pardon every person he needs. If Bush went to courtroom and all the info have been laid out, He, Cheney, and their different Nazi friends could be hung like back interior the Nuremburg trials. yet hi.. Why might Obama choose to get Bush in hardship for doing an identical issues hes doing now? they are all scum.. and sooner or later while u . s . of america starts paying interest they're going to pay for what theyve achieved.
2016-12-12 19:26:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I defy anyone in this forum - and I mean anyone - to post solid, proven facts, not spin-doctored fairy tales or some drivel from a conspiracy theory web site, of ANY criminal act as defined by law that President Bush, Vice President Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Rumsfield, or Secretary of State Rice have committed in the past six years.
Be prepared to cite chapter and verse as to what they allegedly did. If you're going to say that someone committed war crimes, then you'd better be able to state both specifics - DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF THE OFFENSE - and the specific passage in a legal, binding document that specifically says what they did was a war crime.
If you're going to say that they violated the US Constitution, be prepared to cite both specifics - DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF THE OFFENSE - and the exact verbage and/or requirement and/or amendment that they violated.
I don't think anyone believes for one second that ANY politician is "pure as newly fallen snow;" that ludicrous statement was made only in a lame attempt to bash the President, and hopefully people will see it for what it is.
But I'm sick and tired of hearing all of the whining crybabys and Bush-haters in this forum spout their drivel and nonsense, demanding impeachment and other such stupid actions against someone who was LEGALLY ELECTED (like it or not, Democrats) and has done his best to serve. I have never in my life seen a bunch of people whine and cry for so long about losing an election as the Democrats in this country have! Jeez, get over it already!
Besides, in another two years you get the chance to elect someone you think will do a better job. In the mean time, just shut up and DEAL WITH IT!
UPDATE: 24 hours later and no one has posted any information as to the alleged "criminal offenses" and "war crimes" all of the Bush-haters love to scream about....wonder why that is? Maybe because their bluff has been called? Could be....maybe because the truth hurts, and the stark reality is that no matter how much the Bush-haters would love to believe it, the truth is that Bush is NOT a criminal, does NOT deserve to be impeached, and has NOT committed any "war crimes" or crimes of any type.
BINGO! THAT'S IT!
So, all you Bush-haters out there, keep on dishing out the "thumbs down" symbols because that's all you can do now...I've got four so far; let's see if you can make it ten within the next 24 hours!
2007-01-24 07:28:01 · answer #3 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Coming from a conservative standpoint....................He's not as pure as fallen snow. He's made mistakes just like every other Pres has. So he did a little coke? How about Clinton and his cigar? Least we not forget....."I did not have sexual relations with that woman!" There is only one man who walked water and he was crucified for our sins long ago. Put on trial for "crimes against humanity and treason"? These people need to grow up.
2007-01-24 07:14:46 · answer #4 · answered by lucasandmariepape 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I don't think that he is as pure as snow, but he has not committed any crimes against humanity. I agree with what another person said, every president has been accused of something, and it is usually false accusations and stupidity from other parties that couldn't their guy in office. I am a conservative republican, but I don't always vote for the republican who is running. People need to find another way of working out their own frustrations, get a hobby or something.
2007-01-24 07:19:48 · answer #5 · answered by vegaschic 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I don't think he is as pure as newly fallen snow but I also don't think he has committed crimes against humanity. I am unaware of any crimes he has commit ed but if he is in fact proven guilty he should be treated according to US penal code.
2007-01-24 07:10:44 · answer #6 · answered by joevette 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Kennedy - Bay of Pigs --- How many died and were betrayed
Clinton - Whitewater -- Monica - Perjury - destroying documents - thefts from the white house. Even a marine sniper had Bin Laden in his sites - but Clinton ordered them to stand down.
Nixon - Watergate
Senator Kennedy actually killing a woman in an accident
We could go tit for tat all day on the Criminals who have been in office.
show me an investigative document that proves this President to be a criminal - not some left wing rhetoric. The war is not a crime - there is always death in war for the ones who keep crying.
2007-01-24 07:17:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
I say he's done a lot of bad things but as President has a lot of people covering his *** to make sure he doesn't do anything illegal (or at least not illegal enough, meaning something that is left open to interpretation) so a trial is pointless.. unlike what the republicans did to Clinton.. lets work towards making the next 2 years a good thing.
2007-01-24 07:11:38 · answer #8 · answered by pip 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
I am not certain what criminal behavior you speak of. It would seem that railroading a sitting President with outlandish criminal charges would hurt every President after him. Win the elections and you won't need those tactics. If you use those tactics they will in turn be used against you.
2007-01-24 07:09:17 · answer #9 · answered by Boilerfan 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Neither, it would be nearly impossible to prove he committed any crimes. All he would have to say is he recieved very bad information. There is no way that man is as pure as snow. He is somewhere in the middle.
2007-01-24 07:15:28 · answer #10 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Mr and Mrs Clinton were criminals. W is a patriot and a hero to humanity. If liberals didnt stand in the way this war would be over by now.
2007-01-24 07:13:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋