With 300,000,000 million people in the U.S., why do some resist a free market solution to healthcare?

Question

If the government managed healthcare, it would need roughly $10,000 per year per person (not counting the illegal aliens) in escrow, and if all were insured, isn't that $3,000,000,000,000? When has the government had $3,000,000,000,000 laying around--per year?

That's outrageous you say? Cut it in half then. It is still $1,500,000,000,000.

And this is only one program out of thousands. I don't see how we're going to be able to continue to pay for all these programs as they all grow out of control, unless we bring rugged individualism back in fashion.

3 trillion is 3,000 separate stacks of one-dollar bills from the earth to the moon.

Answer 1

human nature we have inherently been designed to oppose free market , as we think capitalistic tendency are bad and "evil" whereas it the basis of why an economy runs, compare USA to most state run economies ho are in shambles, yet politicians and public are all somehow scared to admit that there is no solution, and I assume after some time when there would be no choice then we would hear it in the state of the union......... personally speaking I think its the political tug of war because of which both sides are cautious......

Answer 2

properly, we've those coverage companies, that are each and each self adequate companies, and we've those hospitals, that are additionally self adequate, so..... it extremely is why that's a unfastened industry device. regrettably, it extremely is not as physically powerful as different unfastened industry platforms because of the fact.... i've got not got a lot interior the way of decision. I even have wellbeing care by artwork; i did no longer %. the provider, nor can i %. the provider. i did no longer %. that provider's community of hospitals and docs they artwork with, nor can i %. them. If i grow to be very properly off, then i could desire to purchase a wellbeing care plan of my decision. an somewhat small share of human beings are in that place to make that decision. even though it continues to be a unfastened industry device. the foremost subject is the cost. it extremely is too high priced, because of the fact of this decision is constrained. offering a million,000 diverse strategies is unfastened industry, whether none of them are low priced, although that's a shaggy dog tale, because of the fact realistically there is one decision: what your artwork aspects, or none, and for some, they are able to truly choose what they want. genuine unfastened industry, laissez faire, could be thoroughly palms off, yet that is risky if left unchecked. And so some distance as liberals go, there greed is rational human beings's opposition. Curious too that they does no longer see their own call for of a central authority care decision as grasping.