After his state of the union address last night, and the negative reaction from Congress, what do you think? Lame or dead?
2007-01-24 05:52:25 · 24 answers · asked by The Nana of Nana's 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
It's a despicable thing when our people in this country bash the President. It doesn't matter if you love him, hate him, agree or disagree- he is the President and that is noble and deserving of respect! You want to rail on someone, do it to all the idiots who voted for him.
2007-01-24 05:57:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Lame duck for sure, but that was guaranteed when he was re-elected. He has a lot of work to do to get some of the approval back, and those things he talked about last night aren't going to help. We don't need a temporary workers program, we need immigration reform. We don't need this new medical plan, we need actual socialized medical care. Everything that he spoke about is what his constituents want, not what the general public needs.
2007-01-24 05:57:04 · answer #2 · answered by quatrapiller 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Lame for now. Dead to others, but that is only wishful thinking. I try to support whoever leads a country.
2007-01-24 05:55:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Neither. His speech was solid as was his demeanor. However, the snake in the grass dems sitting behind him and sneering from the crowd would be the lame ones. He is the Commander in Chief. They are his subordinates. They need to be a lot more respectful. That is why we have a President.
2007-01-24 05:57:44 · answer #4 · answered by BrewMan 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
As long as he has power, he's a lame duck. The worst thing about this is nobody's doing anything about it! No impeachment, nothing! I feel the Congress' general mind-set is "Ah, he'll be gone in another year anyway!!" But one thing's for sure: he should go down in the books as the WORST president ever!!
2007-01-24 05:56:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The term dead duck comes to mind but the secret service will come harrass me if I say that. He's an ostrich where Iraq is concerned and a dirty dog ***-hole for stealing 2 elections. And I voted for the son-of-a-*****.
2007-01-24 05:59:30 · answer #6 · answered by scar_strangled_banter 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
both. i imagine a veto spells an impeachment, notwithstanding, i do no longer imagine they receives both/3 majority to convict him, clone of they not in any respect impeached Clinton for that very reason! in reality no president has ever been impeached. the in user-friendly words one which would want to were is Nixon, yet he resigned!
2016-12-03 00:06:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, he certainly isn't a lame duck...unless of course you have been to the future and YOU know who won the 08 election...if he was a "lame duck" then congress wouldn't have passed a non-binding resolution, they would have passed a BINDING resolution..
2007-01-24 05:56:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You used "dead" and "GW Bush" in the same sentence...the Secret Service are coming....
2007-01-24 05:56:17 · answer #9 · answered by Haven 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
how about a lame duck swimming in circles trying to smell the bottom of the pond?
yea, that about sums it up haha
2007-01-24 05:56:19 · answer #10 · answered by colera667 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋