That it is more like a "Survivor" show than a business show? After all they did not sign up to be "living in tents".
Trying to compete for a job with Trump, every side should have the same advantages. Do you agree with the reason the last person quit? I do.
It is not fair, and I feel that they are trying two different types of shows into one.
Agree?
2007-01-24 05:44:35 · 7 answers · asked by Dave 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Trump's new layout is bound to fail, unfortunately. Changing the bones of the show so dramatically spells desperation.
I completely agree with her resignation. Those people were living like rats for a measly 100k yearly payout. Some of the candidates made more than twice 100k before they took the challenge.
The premise for Trump's show has become stupid. They will never attract real talent now. Who wants to suit up in the mud?
2007-01-24 05:53:31 · answer #1 · answered by Lana Lang 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No but it is juvenile to do the bit with the tents . It is unrealistic to expect an executive to have to live in a tent if he/she is working for Trump. He should do away witht he teams and start over in the mansion.
I thought Michelle lied about what was going on. Sure she hated the tent but she hated the people more and she knew that they were going to make it seem as though she was indecisive instead of a person trying to get a consensus of opinion from her team. I thought I was watching the Caine Mutiny that night.
Sure they should do away with the tents. Yes, she is right that they did not sign up for this stuff. Still she was lousy at telling him that he was being childish and that no opportunity is that invaluable. If you want professionals you have to treat them professionally. You lead by example and Trump is setting a lousy example. I would have told him that and made sure he knew i was not accepting his opinion in this situation.
As for the rest of the candidates, they should have agreed with her and supported her. He should have fired her entire team and merged the other three with the nine in the mansion. I can't believe they asked Michelle to stay so that he would not fire one of them.
2007-01-24 18:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you on the tent thing. It doesn't really fit right with the show. As for why the last person, Michelle, quit, I can see that she wasn't used to the whole "living in the tent" thing but I think she bowed out because she knew she was gonna be fired but that's for another debate lol. Overall, it seems like all these new(and not so great changes) have been made to the new Apprentice. It's gonna take awhile to get used to.....if I can stand to watch it anymore
2007-01-24 07:13:02 · answer #3 · answered by gemchic81 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree totally. This is supposed to be the ultimate job interview. Coming to work exhausted and without being able to wash or iron properly puts them at a huge disadvantage.
All these changes are too much like other reality shows. Are they going to do relay races in upcoming episodes?
Also, I have to say I felt so bad for Aaron's team on the last episode when they won. Trump says "Your reward is that good feeling you have for winning. Nothing else. You still don't get to move into the house." What???? The other team are drinking champagne and getting massages for winning, and Aaron's gang gets SQUAT?
2007-01-24 06:03:00 · answer #4 · answered by loves2fly84095 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's marketing. It's a reality TV show. It's entertainment. Donald Trump is not only looking for someone to hire for his company, he's also making money from the reality TV show. He wants to have good ratings so he can make more money. In order to do that he has to make the show interesting.
The fact is, he's doing two things at once: 1- A very intense job interview. 2- A reality TV show.
2007-01-24 05:49:57 · answer #5 · answered by Go16 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think the whole tent city idea is ridiculous. It is not fair at all to the losing side. Also, from what they show on tv, the area is a dump. It is disgusting and very unsanitary. I don't blame Michelle for leaving. I probably would too.
This is just a very sad attempt to win ratings.
2007-01-24 06:10:37 · answer #6 · answered by smm_8514 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't like the idea of putting them in tents. Don't they have enough to deal with without that extra little hardship. I have a great deal of respect for Melissa (wasn't that her name?) for quitting. I think she was being true to herself. She would have (and should have) been fired anyway.
2007-01-24 05:49:54 · answer #7 · answered by comet girl...DUCK! 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋