2007-01-24 05:41:43 · 33 answers · asked by Michael T 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No! Being President is a tough job. I think the American public should cut them more slack. We don't need to nit-pick everything they do. Clinton should not have had it happen and neither should Bush.
Unless there is a clear cut crime outside of the of a Presidents realm of athority, they should not wast time and money on such stupid things. How much of the US's time, money, and reputation was lost on Clinton?
2007-01-24 05:44:47 · answer #1 · answered by bal z 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Because any efforts in the past 6 years would not have made it out of the House and Senate.....until now. I say Impeach the guy! What he has done is FAR worse than anything Clinton ever did. At least hooking up with an intern didn't kill 3,000 people and turn the world against us.
2007-01-24 05:45:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Do a search before you ask a question, PLEASE! This has been asked here many many times.
There's alot of nutters out there preaching this creed. As stated in the past, and by some here today, there have been no charges leveled accusing the President of any impeachable offences.
I know the liberal crazies out there are hoping that San Fran Nan will start investigations with special prosecutors and all, but I don't think that will happen.
2007-01-24 05:54:50 · answer #3 · answered by smatthies65 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Americans in general are more prudish about sex and a lot more tolerant and less vigilant against uncontrolled power, lies and an unjust war that is taking the lives of thousands of Iraqi citizens.
Plus it will be shameful and dangerous for an American president to be tried for crimes that America thinks only third world despots are guilty of.
So we sweep it under the rug and hope the rest of the world did not notice. It will of course, hurt us in the end but we're hoping it does not.
2007-01-24 05:47:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because the process would expose their own misdeeds in many cases, and simply bring facts to light that are contrary to what Democrats say. These would include, but not be limited to, their role in promoting the war and the facts the president relied on.
2007-01-24 05:46:27 · answer #5 · answered by Benji 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No one has tried to impeach him because they obviously have more of a brain than you do on this matter. What do you think this is? 1998? Bill isn't the one in office anymore.
Bush hasn't done anything that would call for it. Anyone who knows a mere three things about politics can tell you that.
2007-01-24 06:08:17 · answer #6 · answered by Emma 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Good question! I often have asked myself this very question. I know that there are a couple in the House of Reps. that have, but it hasn't gotten any further than just a few...which isn't enough.
An extramarital affair, verses, killing and maiming thousands of American soldiers based on many lies that Bush stated to get into the war with Iraq (which in and of itself goes against the American constitution the very thing that Bush swore to uphold.) Not to mention the massive human rights abuses and Treaties that Bush has done.
Bush is even WORSE than Nixon!
2007-01-24 05:57:15 · answer #7 · answered by hera 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I don't think he has in him to stain a dress. He failed all he has tried to do, because he is crooked and crooks finally get caught
I wish they would impeach, Bush, Cheney, Rice just get rid of the whole caboodle.
2007-01-24 05:50:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
He has had a Republican Congress-they wouldn't do it.
Besides, we'd get Cheney for President then. That would be worse.
We have the Democrats in power now.
Let's impeach both, find them guilty, and kick them out. Then, we'd have the new House Chairman as President. That's be OK with me.
2007-01-24 05:50:51 · answer #9 · answered by Shossi 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What are you talking about!!!?????!!!???
The Ghost of Tokyo Rose
Vanity | 1/24/07 | Wil H
Anyone who remembers anything about World War II, or has studied anything about World War II, will understand and remember that during World War II, the Japanese developed a way to demoralize the American forces. The Japanese psychological warfare experts developed a message they felt would work.
They gave their psychological warfare script to their famous broadcaster "Tokyo Rose" and every day she would broadcast this same message packaged in different ways, hoping it would have a negative impact on American an GI's morale.
What was that demoralizing message?
It had three main points:
1. Your President is lying to you.
2. This war is illegal.
3. You cannot win the war.
Does this sound familiar?
Is it because
Tokyo Hillary, Tokyo Harry, Tokyo Teddy, Tokyo Nancy, Tokyo Durbin, Tokyo Kerry, TOKYO MURTHA, etc. have all learned from the former enemies of our country and have picked up the same message and are broadcasting it on:
Tokyo CNN, Tokyo ABC, Tokyo CBS, Tokyo NBC, etc. to our troops?
The only difference is that they claim to support our troops before they try to demoralize them.
Come to think of it... Tokyo Rose told the American troops she was on their side, also.
2007-01-24 05:49:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋