Why did John Kerry's people have the video "Kerry Speaks", where he admitted to committing war atrocities, removed from YouTube?
2007-01-24 05:40:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
KERRY SPEAKS
It was John Kerry speaking about his war atrocities and saying explicitly that he committed atrocities like burning villages where women and children resided.
2007-01-24 05:49:04 · update #1
Socialists depend upon 'generational amnesia' to get people to forget what they did in the past so they can get away with more mischief in the future.
They don't want inconvenient truths like "Kerry Speaks" floating out there to remind people.
2007-01-24 05:44:22 · answer #1 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
John Kary's book, video and testimony before Congress have all been demonstrated to be based on dubious and fabricated claims.
Investigations were conducted in the early 70's by the Department of Defense and turned up little evidence that any of the attrocities actually took place. If they had turned up evidence, John Kary would have been charged. He was a punk kid at that time, not a Senator. He wasn't charged because he was lying.
2007-01-24 05:56:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to see some evidence that "Kerry's people" had a video removed.
FYI, here's the transcript of what he actually said when speaking before the Foreign Relations Committee; nowhere does it say that *he* committed atrocities:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/20/1535232
2007-01-24 05:47:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Probably for the same reason Kerry, unlike Bush, wouldn't release his military records
2007-01-24 05:43:51 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
the reason of dropping the conflict become via a lack of will on the abode the front via a lot of inauspicious press converage and opportunistic exploiters like Kerrry, Murtha and some thing else of that circus troupe. we ought to continuously have not gotten into that mess contained in the first position, yet we were too unswerving to our disloyal "best chum" France and so enable ourselves get dragged into there. by technique of ways, it become Democrats who were given us in touch contained in the capturing area of that conflict, and Democrats who were given us in touch contained in the escalation of it. to various the posters: what type of freedom do the Vietnamese have now? in case you imagine they are so free, why dont you bypass there somewhat then feeding off of the human beings right here. Get you head out of the soil and verify your data! i recognize human beings of Vietnamese foundation who can allow you to recognize all about the "freedom" which become inflicted on them after the autumn of Saigon. awaken!
2016-12-03 00:06:08 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone committed war atrocities in vietnam. it was probably pulled by the makers for infringement, john kerry doesn't have that authority.
2007-01-24 05:44:10 · answer #6 · answered by uncle osbert 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
They didn't.
Youtube removes slanderous lies themselves.
See Going Up River.
2007-01-24 05:47:36 · answer #7 · answered by Barrett G 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Didn't know it happened. You're going to have to ask "Kerry's people" (whomever they are).
2007-01-24 05:43:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
i am so tired of hearing about him and John Mcaine i want to puke. they are both leaches!
2007-01-24 05:43:36 · answer #9 · answered by ~annie~ 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋