they dont want to do anything it appears. just pretend it does not exist.
2007-01-24 05:37:50 · 13 answers · asked by my name is call me ishamael 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
When pigs fly and hell freezes over!!!
You asked!
2007-01-24 05:42:05 · answer #1 · answered by Centurion529 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
To be honest with you. They are blindly supporting Bush's new plan. It didn't even dawn on me till last night. See, when the president came up with the new plan, he knew it would be opposed by a majority of Congress. This has been seen by the Iraqi gocvernment. It has also made the Iraqis step up a bit and start making things happen because they know the US commitment isn't open ended. The troop surge is to help Iraqi Government get things back under control now that they are determined to make it work. I didn't realize this until I heard hillary talk last night. She almost pissed me off when she told me the democrats should take credit for the iraqi government arresting over 600 Shiite militants because they know the support is minimum. So if you ask me, I say the Bush administration was pretty damn smart to take an opposal and turn it in their favor.
2007-01-24 05:49:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is crap, organic and straightforward. Sept. eleventh become the astounding failure to guard individuals in our heritage, if u.s. were a agency the mess united statesmight want to already be lengthy gone. Bush and his cronies knew about Sept. eleventh. they were advised by technique of a PDB. Bush become even advised they could use planes to attack the united states. the military become no longer waiting, the authorities become no longer waiting and the human beings were no longer warned. get the data, also you should really examine some and develop into extra advised on the topic matters that face our usa. Clinton does no longer have taken u.s. to conflict with lies. Clinton also become one thousand cases smarter than Bush. Clinton had a balanced funds all 8 years or perhaps paid down the debt two times. The debt less than Republicans is as a lot as $9 trillion now without bring about website. The Iraq conflict will cost operating type tax payers $2 trillion over 10 years. Republicans not in any respect pay for his or her own mistakes. in addition they love sending others to wrestle and die doing their dirty artwork for them. Bush and Cheney are both draft dodgers and both liars. We spend $500 billion on protection and would't even keep 22 million illegals from strolling throughout the borders. less than Republicans we spent over $ 900 billion on movie star Wars and it does no longer artwork. we've a patriot gadget that cost tax payers $600 billion and it would want to no longer even end rockets from hitting Israel now. you're saying we've not been attacked, do not you examine. we were attacked global, our allies in Bush's conflict do not count number?
2016-12-03 00:05:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't have a plan:::::
The Ghost of Tokyo Rose
Vanity | 1/24/07 | Wil H
Anyone who remembers anything about World War II, or has studied anything about World War II, will understand and remember that during World War II, the Japanese developed a way to demoralize the American forces. The Japanese psychological warfare experts developed a message they felt would work.
They gave their psychological warfare script to their famous broadcaster "Tokyo Rose" and every day she would broadcast this same message packaged in different ways, hoping it would have a negative impact on American an GI's morale.
What was that demoralizing message?
It had three main points:
1. Your President is lying to you.
2. This war is illegal.
3. You cannot win the war.
Does this sound familiar?
Is it because
Tokyo Hillary, Tokyo Harry, Tokyo Teddy, Tokyo Nancy, Tokyo Durbin, Tokyo Kerry, TOKYO MURTHA, etc. have all learned from the former enemies of our country and have picked up the same message and are broadcasting it on:
Tokyo CNN, Tokyo ABC, Tokyo CBS, Tokyo NBC, etc. to our troops?
The only difference is that they claim to support our troops before they try to demoralize them.
Come to think of it... Tokyo Rose told the American troops she was on their side, also.
2007-01-24 05:50:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
ARe you kidding me? Please pull yourself away from Rush and Fox news. You really are not paying attention or learning a thing by watching or listening to either one of these lame brains. The dems have been concerned with terrorism way before 9/11 and had several bills in congress during the 90's which the republicans rejected as panic selling. Bush completely ignored all intelligence of al queda's plan to attach the U.S on 9/11. And, the dems have been saying all along to fight terrorism in Afganistan, you know, the country where the Taliban have been aiding and hiding the enemy OBL and al queda. the dems also have had policies to secure our borders and our ports much more tighter since April of 2001 (before 9/11). They've been all over this issue since before Bush took office and now you want to blame them for Bush's incompetancies? Give me a break. Iraq was never about terrorism and I would like to know when Bush is actually going to start fighting terrorism in a serious way and stop invading countries that had nothing to do with 9/11.
2007-01-24 05:46:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Why should we?
We did not have a problem with terrorists until ole Georgy-boy bombed Iraq...less than 3 months after he took (and I
mean "took") office the 1st time!
He wanted to let them know (and I quote)..."There's a new sheriff in town!"
I really believe that had he exercised some degree of self-restraint, 9-11 never would've happened!
Yet, Bush is just like a toddler with a wet diaper and a dirty nose: one would really have to chase him down, clean him up, and swat him on his wrinkled little bottom for being such a bothersome @ss and a hard-headed little runt!
2007-01-24 05:56:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Democrats will come up with a plan when the Republicans come up with a plan. So far, the War on Terror is an unmitigated disaster.
2007-01-24 05:42:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Liberals announce their plan for the war all the time: they want to surrender and retreat. They have a dozen different ways of saying it, never involving those two words, but that's what it is.
When was the last time you were in a fist fight with a bully and announced that you were going to "redeploy" to the other side of the playground and call it victory?
The bully will follow you and kick your petookis all the way to the other side, won't he?
(Do they think we're idiots?)
2007-01-24 05:45:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
We've had plenty of plans.. we were a big part of the Iraqi War panel after all, stop lying.
2007-01-24 06:45:06 · answer #9 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same do you explain what Iraq had to do with the war on terror.
2007-01-24 05:44:37 · answer #10 · answered by kberto 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Currently, this is the responsibility of the sitting president, who doesn't have the foggiest idea about what he is doing.
2007-01-24 05:46:49 · answer #11 · answered by Preacher 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋