2007-01-24 05:16:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Let's send him to Iraq!
2007-01-24 06:00:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a free country, which would cut off everyone from getting any money or connections from their parents, this self-indulgent, low-IQ draftdodger would be some wino living under a bridge.
If real Americans have to get by on their own, so must these maggots spawned by the rich, who try to buy the love of their spawn by giving them unearned competitive advantages. Like Senator Webb, I'd like to twist the Bushling's smirking lips until they bleed and use his face as a punching bag. Anyone who wouldn't is just a self-hating peasant and boytoy of the aristocracy.
2007-01-24 13:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a human being, I don't know how he has stood up through
all the hatred that's been directed at him, and all the opposition
that he knows exists, yet he still remains a gentleman, a man
of character and unfetered spirit and resolve. He is a man who
stands up for what he believes in, and tho the war has not gone
as he had hoped, he still wants the U.S. to help the poor people
of Iraq (that begged for help) and to keep terrorists away from
our country. That is a noble cause he stands up for, especially in a room full of attacking sharks. He wants victory for us.....and we all should want that same thing. He was a class act during his State of the Union speech. God Bless Him.
2007-01-24 13:28:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he is a great "CEO" but a pretty bad "PR" rep. If he had Tony snow earlier, and fired Rummy earlier, and somehow prevented the democrats from sabotaging him to no end, he would have been one of the greatest presidents. I do however think that history will be MUCH kinder to him than Bill Clinton. Hell, Bill left office with like a 98% approval rating and already his legacy is under attack. I believe that in time, Bush will look 100 times better in retrospect than his 33% approval rating.
2007-01-24 13:24:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just a silly, rebellous, rotten, spoilt child who hasn't mentally matured and is too used to getting what he wants in the Bush home, and is determined to continue showing his tantrums to get what he wants and in denial of his wrong and wicked ways.
Brings to mind today's news about that little girl in the plane who refused to stop crying and has parents who not only can't contol her, but get upset when told to leave the plane with that little nuisance of a kid. The kid would probably grow up to be like Bush, always wanting to have it her way. Spare the rod and spoil the child!
2007-01-24 13:31:27 · answer #5 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well,I think America needs a president that has actually worked and fought in war to understand life.Of course Bush is listening to his greed and not his citizens,just like most politicians.
2007-01-24 13:32:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought Ronald Reagan was bad, but George W. Bush could have taken him to school. What with the war based on lies and as far as that goes, two terms based on the lies that he won fair and square.
2007-01-24 13:21:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If I was making $400,000 per year and could have 30 or 40 people write my speeches I would not care what my friends or any one else would say.just like "GEORGE".
2007-01-24 13:23:46 · answer #8 · answered by curleyhead2000 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hate him for everything he has done & wants to do to our country...he is the most anti-American president we have ever had....I think he should be impeached & tried for treasonist acts against our country....then hanged!
2007-01-24 13:21:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think he should send his two college educated and unemployed daughters to Iraq.
2007-01-24 13:23:08 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋