2007-01-24 05:01:20 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He was INAUTHENTIC. He was trying to be something he was not. Remember the incident with the hunting trip?
He may not have won if he were more honest, but America won't vote for someone who is hiding the truth about who he is.
He also didn't have principles - he appeared to twist with the wind, even on important issues like the war. "I actually voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it." Again, the truth was he was too far left, but the shading and insincerity made it even worse.
He also had no "common touch." His personality turned people off.
2007-01-24 05:26:39 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Poor grooming habits
However some RedsStaters would argue having a billion dollars in your pocket does not equate to a downfall. The very first article of the NeoConism Charter is Money in the moment first. Kerry has met this basic Red Standard.
You should also consider how many Skull&Bones members suffered downfall.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-24 05:08:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He offered no answers because he had none. His elitist attitude that came not from his own accomplishments, but the fact that he married money, twice. Inventing his own past. His 'chicken with it's head chopped off' or 'fish on the river bank' habits----flip! flop! flip! flop!
2007-01-24 06:52:27 · answer #3 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, for one thing, he's got the charisma of a doorknob. Also, he comes across as a bit of a wuss. By the way, I'm a Democrat, and I voted for Kerry in the last election, because I thought that anybody was better than Bush.
2007-01-24 05:04:56 · answer #4 · answered by tangerine 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The fact that he ran for president. He had more political influence as a senator.
2007-01-24 05:06:59 · answer #5 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His elitist attitude, which so many in his party have, and the fact that he can't tell a joke to save his life.
2007-01-24 05:09:44 · answer #6 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because no one ever voted for him they just voted against Bush. Since Bush isn't running he won't have a chance.
2007-01-24 05:10:58 · answer #7 · answered by dullorb 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's not very charaismatic. He's a smart man, accomplished, and knows his stuff when it comes to military, but the republicans were too underhanded with all that swift boat crap.
I can't believe people fell for that!
2007-01-24 05:11:33 · answer #8 · answered by Summer 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When he went hunting that one time right before the election. What a dope.
2007-01-24 05:04:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
His personality.
2007-01-24 05:04:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋