Don't you wish the Democrats would let Bush win the War in Iraq?

Question

Let's be honest here - it's not like the Democrats have a better 'plan' or even THINK they have a better plan, or even care about plans. What they are clearly trying to do is sabotage America in the War on Terror so that they can point the finger at Bush since "the buck stops there." Have they no conscieous? Don't they even stop to think that they are indirectly responsible for the deaths of more troops? They try to say that it is Bush that is killing troops, but if allowed to WIN the war, many LESS troops would die. But Dems obviously care more about making Bush look bad than saving the lives of troops. They are willing to weaken America to gain power. It is really sick.
What do you think?

Oh yeah, and for those of you that say Iraq is "unwinnable" let me just say that you are right as long as Democrats are sabotaging the effort.

"Redeploying troops" is not a plan. That is called "letting the enemy win."

Answer 1

You are 100% correct..
Congress is also the reason the US lost the VN war..

Answer 2

The Democrats (alongside with the Republicans) gave Bush the authority to invade and occupy Iraq with the Joint determination to Authorize using u . s . military adversarial to Iraq. they have finally end up apologetic about this because the Bush apologists were preserving it over their heads, ever because. The structure provides Congress the ability to fund the conflict. thus far Congress has given Bush each cent he requested for and larger. They lately tried to placed circumstances on the money through attaching a withdrawal aims and Bush vetoed it. they have because given Bush the money with little or no circumstances. As Commander in chief that is Bush's duty to go back up with a technique. thus far he hasn't even given us a definition of "prevailing". If Bush has failed that is his fault and he has no human being else responsible. The Democrats have a technique. Many have made it very sparkling that they'd redeploy the troops and bypass lower back to searching down Osama bin encumbered and getting justice for 911. they'd have the Constitutional authority to set up this technique at the same time as Democrats win lower back the presidency in 2008.

Answer 3

I`m British I never had a fantastic education, at the time I thought it was bluff they were scaring the pants of Saddam I never thought for a minute Iraq would be invaded.
Over here the conservatives backed the action as you would expect at the time. The million £ bombs started firing from the ships into Baghdad and thicko me thought there was something not right,call it what you want these expensive bombs killed innocent people and we watched this on TV.shocking is`nt it.
I said at the time in discussion with friends this was`nt right.now we have all learned it was wrong.
Your democrats are like our conservatives they have had a hand in this masive miscalulation.

Answer 4

I think the democrats and a lot of the republicans have a better plan. I believe its been released to the public.

Bush declared the war over, not sure what its called now...in Viet Nam it was called a police action.

Do not ever assume that democrats do not care about our troops...I have family stationed in Iraq NOW.

LIB

Answer 5

Actually it seems that both Obama and Clinton agree that invading Iran is a good idea. Clinton actually scolded Bush for not having bombed them already.

More troops in Iraq = BACK UP!



Oh, and by the way... the war was a success. Now it is technically police action cause the job was to disarm Saddam... Well I'd say Saddam is disarmed, wouldn't you? Now the Iraqis can vote and they are moving more towards democracy. It's just that there are people who do not agree, so they bomb civilians... Why? Because those civilians have the right to vote, and fear will cause specific votes to be cast... As we seen with Saddam in the past... Hence him getting 99% of the votes. Anyone who gets that high of votes is OBVIOUSLY doing something that he isn't supposed to be.

Guess what though... I bet he had ZERO this past election.

People just don't look at the obvious.

Answer 6

The President has had his shot and has made a mess of monumental proportions. Time for the Dems to come in and fix things. There have been at least two plans offered up by Congress which will be ignored by Bush. Where have you been?

Answer 7

No one wants to be involved in a war, this has nothing to do with Democrat allowing Bush to win the war in Iraq, that war can not be won there. I don't know if your old enough to really know what war really is and it not something that anyone would want to be involved in trust me, I have been involved in war (Vietnam) and it not something that is good for any country.

Answer 8

I completely agree with you. I found it sad when Bush mentioned the word "victory" and not one Democrat stood and Nancy Pelosi sat there like a wart on a frog and didn't even applaud the possibility of victory... How sad that the party in control of the House and Senate has absolutely NO faith in our military.The same military that we as a Nation depend on for our defense...How can any American applaud the contempt shown by the Democrats and even defend them... Sad

Answer 9

the Dems are giving Bush everything he wants so they do not get blamed for failure. They won't cut off funds for the troops either. It is Bush's war to win or lose.

Answer 10

Hell yes. The democrats have no plan whatsoever otherwise they would present it to the public and congress and show how to fix something. As always they have to play partisan politics and disagree with anything that the republicans say.

Answer 11

It's unwinnable because "winning" isn't definable..

What is winning? Establishing a democracy? For how long? And how long do we have to maintain a presence? And at what cost?