2007-01-24 03:15:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Hear, hear I totally agree with you. Not only do we let them come over here but we seem to condone the fact that they commit crimes and treat them exactly the same as we do our own. The minute they commit an offence, however minor, they should be sent home. Mind you that should go for all the illegal immigrants as well.
2007-01-24 05:15:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mainly because there are no international laws that would guarantee those prisoners completed their sentence in their home country - and therefore they would go unpunished.
Also the number of non-British citizens in British prisons is stastically so insignificant as to not make a serious impression on prison overcrowding. If you were to follow your idea, the places you created would be filled within one day by new convictions of British citizens.
2007-01-24 07:56:54 · answer #2 · answered by Timothy M 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because the crimes were commited in this country. Here's a situation... let's say there's a child molester in prison and he's from Mexico (I have noting against Mexico, it's just the first country I thought of) if we send him back to be punished for his crimes what do you think the chances are of him actually serving the kind of sentince he would here in the US? Not likely. And not to mention that people from places like Cuba... they could be killed if sent back.
2007-01-24 03:27:32 · answer #3 · answered by starsmoak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because under current laws any foreigner convicted of a crime in this country has to serve their sentence here, unless their home country agrees to take them back for imprisonment. Once their sentence is completed they can be deported if their conviction was for a sufficiently serious crime.
2007-01-24 11:00:58 · answer #4 · answered by Huh? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly its no longer a poor concept, offered you start up from scratch. construction new centers on overseas soil might want to provide those centers at a more inexpensive expenditures and the labour offered to guy such might want to be more inexpensive, as might want to food & consumables. The usa providing the land might want to wish assurances that the power become truly protect; although they could little doubt welcome the inflow of capital and bigger employment opportunities. notwithstanding the challenge might want to be protecting criminal criteria. The workers manning such places might want to probable be used to a much extra lax yet at the same time brutal penal complex regime; 1st international criteria might want to should be maintained for criminal causes, which will in itself negate a great deal of the aptitude lower price charges. Such centers might want to no longer be considered as a fashion to circumvent the state's duties to the accused!
2016-12-02 23:59:02 · answer #5 · answered by kobielnik 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cause they will be probably be released as soon as they get there, come back and get a house and £ from the goverment.
Although they do need sending to their own country and our immigration tightening.
Oh, and murderers, rapists and child molesters need hanging, that will free some space up.
2007-01-24 03:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by cybermoose1982 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
because then the British prisoners held abroad would be sent back to britain and the overcrowding problem would remain.
2007-01-24 03:29:53 · answer #7 · answered by dumberthangeorgebush 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
because they have been tried in this country and have to serve there sentance in this country and by doing that britian will be seen as racist!
2007-01-24 03:20:56 · answer #8 · answered by Jo. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now that would be the best suggestion i have heard today.
2007-01-24 04:00:39 · answer #9 · answered by andrea m 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because our country doesn't like that idea. i like that idea. and foreigners need to learn to speak english especially if they come here illegally.
2007-01-24 06:18:44 · answer #10 · answered by courtney w 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋