You will be sent to Iraq to do the more menial tasks which will enable the soldiers to do fighting. Is this something you would sign up for?
2007-01-24 03:12:58 · 13 answers · asked by trer 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They scary part of that is - civilians would likely not be covered under the Geneva convention, especially since Bush has chosen to ignore it completely.
Any civilian going over there would be at far greater risk than military personnel.
2007-01-24 03:21:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The military doesn't want me. I'm definitely NOT military material. I'm a rabble rouser without unconditional respect for authority. If I'm asked nicely to do something I'll do it in a heartbeat, but I don't take well to being ordered around.
Besides, I'm too old to go through basic training. I'd never make it anyway.
2007-01-24 03:25:06 · answer #2 · answered by kj 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might want to like him to the contact upon kinfolk subject matters. Our economy is going right into a ditch and he hasn't executed any drastic measures. The Iraqi conflict has cost us $three hundred,000,000 (3-hundred-billion). we would have used that money for therefore a lot extra. i want him to finally face the topic matters what about recuperating securities at abode. Why no longer decrease funding for all terrorism by technique of quit utilizing overseas oil and instead use kinfolk power substances. we would have lengthy gone in spite of everything the terrorist sponsoring countries financially by technique of pulling their leash on the international in words of power stability.
2016-12-02 23:59:00 · answer #3 · answered by kobielnik 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
F'no. Not for a war without reason or benefit (FOR AMERICA!). Plus, you know, when fighting these kind of folks - the civilians are 10x more targeted than armed soldiers.
2007-01-24 03:20:14 · answer #4 · answered by city_shuffle 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The war is open ended, and that wont hold up for much longer with the 3rd and stressful deployment of the same troops. Bush has cashed in everything, and I don't see any improvement.
2007-01-24 03:22:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What I want to know is: does "volunteer" mean that you don't get paid?
I won't be volunteering. I am disabled and over the age for the military, of course, I served in Vietnam, Richard Nixon's war.
.
2007-01-24 03:18:31 · answer #6 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, yes. I would and will go in a heartbeat if they will take me.. I've raised my kids and I owe it to my country to give back for the blessings I have enjoyed by being an American all these years. I also owe it to our troops to stand beside them and do my part.
My goodness, based on the responses you are getting, so much for supporting the troops and patriotism.
2007-01-24 03:23:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No..I wouldn't. Sounds too much like Hitler's Brown Shirts!! Do you research people.
2007-01-24 03:21:25 · answer #8 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
heel no because George Bush already made the USof A look even worse than they already are, why should i support him?
2007-01-24 03:20:32 · answer #9 · answered by SuNDeViL 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this what it meant? It would be kinda neat. Dangerous but good experience and save on our troops and maybe get the job done sooner.
2007-01-24 03:17:39 · answer #10 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋