English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Senators;
Richard Lugar
Gordon Smith
George Voinovich
Sam Brownback
Susan Collins
Chuck Hagel
Olympia Snowe
John Warner

2007-01-24 02:41:59 · 10 answers · asked by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

To accentuate the seriousness of what you have just said, that constitutes 1 in 6 Republican Senators.

This matter is now coming to a head and if there is any honesty in Washington, Bush should have impeachment investigations round his neck.

2007-01-24 02:49:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

right here Dr_Knowital, this would help: "Sarah Palin's concept that the abode well being-care reform bill might want to create "lack of existence panels" will be really extreme, yet she's infrequently the in user-friendly words man or woman to wildly misunderstand the area of the bill ordering Medicare to conceal voluntary end-of-existence counseling classes between docs and their sufferers. between the most suitable advocates of increasing Medicare end-of-existence planning coverage is Johnny Isakson, a Republican Senator from Georgia. He co-subsidized 2007's Medicare end-of-existence planning Act and proposed an modification reminiscent of the abode bill's area 1233 in the course of the Senate help Committee's mark-up of its well being care bill. I reached Sen. Isakson at his workplace this afternoon. He become befuddled that this had develop right into a question of euthanasia, termed Palin's interpretation "nuts," and emphasised that each and every one 50 states presently have some legislations allowing end-of-existence directives. A transcript of our verbal change follows." the article says precisely what the asker claims.

2016-12-02 23:56:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

John Warner and Jim Webb - two former Secretaries of the Navy on different sides of the isle are both against the Iraq policy.

Hey, Bush really IS a uniter!

2007-01-24 02:58:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There's a difference between doubting its wisdom and casting a vote of non confidence on the President because it's the political flavor of the week.

2007-01-24 02:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by twoskinsoneman 2 · 0 0

For me personally, I will not label people for disagreeing with the policies in Iraq. I have lambasted those who make it obvious that they are more concerned with their hatred of Bush than they are for what's in the best interest of this country. People who present alternative solutions, whether I agree or not, are to be more respected than people who seem to have an agenda to oppose using any tatic at their means - ranging from misinformation, e.g. "Bush lied", to the outrageous conspiracy theories.

Again, personally, I happen to not be a Kool-aide drinker for Bush, I don't feel he belongs in the list of all-time greats such as Lincoln, Truman, and Reagan, but I see the war (from my direct involvement having served in the military) differently than many of your cohorts and even some of mine. I believe the media is showing the general public a very narrow perspective of how things are going to match their agendas. I believe that the war is winnable, that we are appreciated there (I've seen this personally), and that it has kept us safer here at home. I agree with Bush that failure should not be an option - but if we continue to have already lost in the minds of the citizen, we will lose, and our grandchildren will face less freedom than we face today (even with the supposed violations of freedoms people are so upset about with Bush).

So to humour you, yes, there are a number of scared-off GOP politicians and they are still Republicans even though they don't fall in line with everything Bush says. The GOP party line has never been as rigid a platform as the other side, which is why you are attempting to use it against us, because you see it as a weakness that has been exposed. It's just how we are - rational thinkers who vote for those who we feel give our country the best chance of strength in areas of defense and homeland security - an area that Bush admittedly has fallen short on a number of accounts. So will your guys offer anyone stronger in those areas than Gore or Kerry? You better hope so, cause it the only chance you have for the White House.

2007-01-24 03:02:30 · answer #5 · answered by Whootziedude 4 · 0 1

No I call all Congressmen traitors for selling out the American people to special interest lobbyists, or whomever is the highest bidder!

2007-01-24 02:50:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You mean the same as the Democrats did to the Semetors that continue to support the war? BTW the number is only at 4 at this point. get your facts straight.

2007-01-24 02:57:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Nope. They have a right to believe whatever they want, and I'm sure they'll do it respectfully.

2007-01-24 02:56:14 · answer #8 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1 0

No, most of us won't.

Unfortunately, the loudest voices will be the minority, but will get the most press.

2007-01-24 02:48:16 · answer #9 · answered by Culture Warrior 4 · 2 0

NO.

2007-01-24 02:46:52 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers