If Hillary wins, that will be at least 24 years of Bush and Clinton in the WH. Is that good for America?

Question

1989 through at least 2013, maybe 2017. If you count Bush 41 as VP, it we go from 1981-2017, which is 36 years!

Answer 1

i don't think electing another clinton or a bush is good for this country it's like a dam monopoly on politics

Answer 2

I have that concern too. It is also interesting to note that all four of them were educated at some point at Yale University. I don't necessarily subscribe to any conspiracy theories (yet) but it is an interesting side note. I think HRC has a better chance of winning than anyone believes. We need strong leaders and we aren't getting them from either the Bush or Clinton political machine. At this point, the only candidate I see with anything more than a pre-spinal column in them is Tom Tancredo and I doubt a congressman from Colorado has much chance on a national stage.

Answer 3

Hillary Clinton will not win the Presidency, in 2008 or ever.

A) She is a woman, and will lose too many male votes

and

B) She is widely know as being a crook (fraudulent land deals in Arkansas) that she got out of by other people going to jail (they didn't testify against her, and she and Bill paid them highly for that loyalty).

and

C) People don't want her socialistic healthcare, which will raise taxes on everyone to the levels Canadians have (and Canada's free healthcare system is failing as people die waiting for treatment and operations).

Answer 4

Well it was good for America when Bill Clinton was elected President!

It would not be possible for Hillary to do a worse job as President that what our Village Idiot has done over the last six years!

Answer 5

i does no longer want this to ensue. whilst the Clinton(s) and Bush"es" have performed solid issues for this u . s . a ., familiarity breeds contempt and that i think of issues could purely worsen off. human beings ought to start up practising what they carry forth and be tolerant of Romney's faith...he's the terrific answer to the subject concerns that Bush II positioned us in.

Answer 6

We've already had 92 years of a privately owned corporation dictating our monetary policies and controlling the United States economy. In fact the Demonrats passed the legislation creating the Federal Reserve as a privately owned corporation doing the above.

For years, people like me, have tried to inform the American people of this nasty fact along with Congressmen Ron Paul, Wright Patman, and Louis T. McFadden and economist Milton Friedman. In fact, at Milton Friedman's 90th birthday bash current Fed Chairman Bernanke admitted that the owners of the Federal Reserve had intentionally crashed the American economy which precipitated and perpetuated the Great Depression.

Until then, the owners of the Federal Reserve System had tried to call us conspiracy theorists. I've always said conspiracy factualists. Henry Ford said "if the American people knew how the Federal Reserve operated there would be a revolution overnight."

The reason you probably have heard absolutely none of this is because the same people who own the Federal Reserve also own, by controlling the majority stock, the mainstream media (CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, network radio and 1,000's of newspapers, magazines and websites) and they seek to recruit candidates/politicians who will be compliant.

There is one Member of Congress, currently, who has spoken out against the Federal Reserve. Congressman Ron Paul who is a prospective 2008 Presidential candidate. President Kennedy tried to alter the way the Federal Reserve works until a bullet incidentally entered his skull in Dealey Plaza. Since then, very few major Presidential candidates even remotely discuss this issue.

The interesting thing beyond owning the Federal Reserve and mainstream media is that the owners of the Fed also control, again by owning majority stock, many of the corporations people think are independent of each other and recognize by name. Until the American people realize what the owners of the Federal Reserve are doing to us fiscally and economically - and then unite to abolish the Federal Reserve - we will continue to have puppets in office, from local, to state to federal, who are subserviant to the owners of the Federal Reserve and do their bidding - against our best interests.

The Tax Foundation has some interesting facts for your consideration. In 1900, the average American paid about 5% of their earnings to support (local, state, federal combined) government by way of taxation. In 2000, that number exceeded 33%. There was essentially no longterm public debt in 1900 but by 2000 the numbers are just staggering.

America is slowly being cooked to death like the frog on the saucepan on top of the stove slowly being boiled without realizing it. Do you still believe we're a free nation? Why are you so naive? Now that you have a glimpse of the truth, what are you going to do about it?

Will you copy this and pass it along to your fellow Americans? Will you publicly call for the abolition of the Federal Reserve and support candidates, like Congressman Ron Paul, who do so? Or will you continue to do what you've always done and allow the owners of the Federal Reserve to destroy America and destroy your future just as they did when they created the Great Depression?

Answer 7

Who cares. Obviously there are more Americans that support the Bush and Clinton families than those that don't. So what does it matter who is president?

Answer 8

i'm not sure if i understand the dilemma. they are 4 different people with different platforms and different agendas who have all done and may do different things than the other president with the same name.

the roosevelts and kennedys did different thing and so did other presidents who were family members.

i don't forsee her winning anyway, even though i will most likely vote for her.

Answer 9

Hillary in the White House???? It'll never happen!! Americans are not ready for a female president!

Answer 10

If you left the Bush part out it would be good for the country.