I didn't have to change my mind, I have been on her band wagon for some time. I think she is a strong, very intelligent woman that is not afraid to stand up for what she thinks is right. She has my vote if she makes it that far.
2007-01-24 01:42:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well before I start I must say I am 100% Democrat....and if you check my answers on other post you will see that. However, Hillary is not Presidential material....nor would I vote for her!
This Country would be made even a bigger mockery if she or any other woman was to be placed as President of the US. For one our foreign opponents do not regard women the way we do....therefore when she would speak they would all show total disregard.....secondly, I would hate to see what kind of feminist crap this Country would endure during the first woman President....third she does not show or demonstrate the experience needed for this position! And neither does Obabma!
Evan Bayh....with all his experience as Governor of Indiana and the what 16 years as Senator does not even think its time for himself to make that step.....so what qualifies her?
Popularity is not a substitution for experience......and popular she is....experienced enough she is not!
2007-01-24 01:47:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because when someone announces their intention to run for President of the United States, it is your right as a citizen of this country to question their qualifications. Don't you want to know? Or are you going to just blindly cast your vote? Scary!
2007-01-24 01:44:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Maudie 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Change is going to happen..but like you I know nothing about Obama...be honest he has no chance.. Hillary is too devisive..Much to chagrin of many democrats..not that many people liked Bill CLinton(he never got 50% of the popular vote)...vote for Ron Paul.
2007-01-24 01:40:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Are you saying that we SHOULDN'T scrutinize the record and experience of potential Presidential candidates? The same questions are being asked about Obama, McCain, etc.
2007-01-24 01:44:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by dentroll 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good point. There is no way to prepare or have the right experience for the job as President. All we can really hope for is someone that's smart enough to think for themselves and not a puppet.
2007-01-24 01:38:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by ropemancometh 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
Basically, President Bush served 1 1/2 terms as governor of Texas, owned some oil fields, and the Texas Rangers.
Oh, and his dad was PotUS.
2007-01-24 01:39:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by amg503 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
because it does matter. how has she been shown a leader, except for her disastrous tenure as the other president while bill was busy chasing women. she is a shrill woman and has committed many crimes. why did she not run for senator in their beloved home state of arkansas? because they would not have her there, thats why.
2007-01-24 01:42:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Buk (Fey) 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
The real question is why aren't people asking this of every candidate or potential candidate.
2007-01-24 01:42:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
this is our country, we do not give "chances" to our country, ecspecially to bitter unexperienced women who have no business being President!!!
2007-01-24 04:12:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cortney N 3
·
0⤊
1⤋