English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Randy G is right. It is a logarithmic scale.
They do that so you can visualize it more easily. A Richter Scale 7 is 10,000,000 (10^7) times stronger that a Richter Scale 1. A Richter Scale 3 is 1,000 (10^3) times stronger than a Richter Scale 1 - you just cannot see that very easily. The only way to visualize it is by plotting on logarithmic graph paper. Then you see 1, 3, and 7.

2007-01-24 01:28:15 · answer #1 · answered by jules 1 · 0 0

Because the scale is logarithmic, like pH (acidity/alkalinity). An earthquake measuring 8.0 on the Richter Scale would be 100 times more powerful than one measuring 6.0

2007-01-24 09:25:33 · answer #2 · answered by CLICKHEREx 5 · 0 0

Could be that from 6.0 to 7.0 the count goes up by 10,making it 10 times stronger..So that every time the count goes up by 1 you add a 0,so from 7.0 to 8.0 would be 100 times stronger.

2007-01-24 09:19:47 · answer #3 · answered by Bella 7 · 0 0

The Richter scale increases exponentially. For every 1 the scale goes up, you add a zero to how much more powerful the quake was than the number before it.

1.
2 is 10X more than a 1
3 is 100 times more than a 2
etc.

2007-01-24 09:19:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

The Richter scale is logarithmic.

One unit, compared to the next lower unit, is 10 times greater in magnitude.

2007-01-24 09:24:46 · answer #5 · answered by RolloverResistance 5 · 1 0

Because the Richter scale is a logarithmic scale. By definition of "logarithmic", there is a factor of ten difference between each number.

----------------edit----------
A logarithmic scale is a base 10 scale, so each number is multipled by a factor of 10.

2007-01-24 09:20:38 · answer #6 · answered by Randy G 7 · 0 0

Since it's a logarithm with base 10, that means that it'll increase 10x for each unit increase. Does that make sense? You're doing this for AIU Contemporary math aren't you? :D If so, me too. :D

2007-01-26 23:44:09 · answer #7 · answered by jher 1 · 0 0

because the scale is a non-linear exponential growth scale maybe?

2007-01-24 09:18:27 · answer #8 · answered by Bohdisatva 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers