You could just feel the Chickenhawk repubs cringe at the Democratic response of Jim Webb.
2007-01-24 00:39:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The swiftboats are warming up as we speak. Ann Coulter will be pulling a Max Cleland on Webb anytime now. And let's not forget about butt boil Rush.
2007-01-24 00:42:06 · answer #1 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
That has already begun yesterday was a question which went something like "Does Jim Webb look like a deserter to you? Does he look like he'd leave his comrades to die in battle? hats how he looks to me"
I love it when people with no military experience at all feel qualified to say ANYTHING about ANY war veteran, whether its Webb, Kerry or John McCain.
If youll remember Bush's "push-pollers" defamed John McCain in S. Carolina, calling potential voters and asking them if they would vote for McCain if they knew he had fathered a black child out of wedlock (which is completely false, the McCain's child was adopted, neither of his genes nor Ms McCains), of course religious voters were horrified and Bush won the SC primary easily.
And for the "Hawks" in here, where was this military fervor over Bush's TX Air National Guard Service? Our Commander in Chief is a Deserter in a Time of War, plain and simple, but why do none of the Neo Con Pro War "Hawks" bring THAT up?
More "compassionate" conservative hypocracy.
2007-01-24 09:04:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Who would want to smear him just for disagreeing with the president? He has a right to. Oh, and you would call me a "neocon", and I didn't cringe.
2007-01-24 09:01:19 · answer #3 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
probably. think about his campaign. the reason he quit the repub party was over the invasion and handling of iraq.
stange thing is he was of the few against arming and supporting saddam against iran. he tends to be right.
2007-01-24 08:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by J Q Public 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
,Both Monty and Patton had very different views on how to conduct WW2 and argued with Eisenhower over them. In the End Eisenhower did as he damn well pleased, which is the right of the commander. He made decisions even his best advisers hated. I am pure Hawk, no Chicken here!
2007-01-24 08:43:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I don't think anybody will smear his war record. That's not the issue.
The problem is with his thinking and his political beliefs. Those are wrong, just as wrong as yours.
It's sad that so many of you liberals have nothing better to do than insult others. It's pathetic, really.
2007-01-24 08:52:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
They will smear anything and everything that is true and right.
Those people have unlimited supplies of manufactured mud and they are good slingers too.
They ain't called the fear and smear battalion for no reason.
.
2007-01-24 08:43:59 · answer #7 · answered by nemesis 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I think they will still smear him. They've learned that if you keep repeating a lie often enough, no matter how outrageous it is, people will start believing it.
2007-01-24 08:55:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
They will of course try. That's the Rove/Cheney way: attack, personally, professionally, politically
etc. to the point of shameless absurdist demagoguery. Remember Cheney's : "If Kerry is elected, the chances of another terror strike increase."
2007-01-24 08:44:50 · answer #9 · answered by Philip Kiriakis 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
This is so funny. A democrat talking about a smear campaign. LMFAO.
2007-01-24 08:44:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋