A black hole cannot be destroyed by a supernova, because a black hole is the result of a star gone supernova. There are other results of a star gone supernova, but a black hole is one of the results. When a star goes supernova and collapses into itself is when a black hole is born. The dense gravitational pull is so great that even light cannot escape the gravitational pull.Thus creating what looks like a black hole in the cosmos. I hope that answers both your questions.
2007-01-24 00:59:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by dewhatulike 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A supernova could not destroy a black hole. any energy or matter from the supernova that landed on the black hole would disappear inside. To answer the second, a black hole could not contain a supernova. Once inside a black hole, all matter loses its identity
2007-01-24 00:34:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
jasmine, an excellent nova is different from a black hollow. great nova is the explosion that vast stars (>than 3 Suns i imagine) go with the help of on the end of their lives. After this, if the movie star is enormous sufficient, a black hollow will be formed (an truly dense mater in an truly tight position). If no longer, a neutron movie star will be there instead.
2016-12-02 23:50:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. No. The term is outdated. Even Prof. Stephen Hawking, who wrote "A brief history of time.", and "The universe in a nutshell", has got on the bandwagon of those who no longer accept that such a thing as an "event horizon" is possible, and without an event horizon, you can't have a "black hole". Collapsars(short for collapsed stars) is their former name. View the blog of Jack Norton-Krell at www.myspace.com for a better understanding of the second part of your question, as well as "black holes" at Wikipedia (various opinions).
2007-01-24 00:47:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by CLICKHEREx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋