Wow... The Dems' second best candidate has only been senator for 2 years.
Does that mean that the other Dems are ultra-slow learners?
2007-01-23 23:04:51 · 11 answers · asked by tip zz 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Richardson is the best qualified Democratic candidate, he is the only one with experience managing a bureaucracy or demonstrating leadership ability, and he has done so succesfully.
Being a Senator of 6 years (Clinton/Edwards) or 2 years (Obama) does not require leadership abilities and those candidates have never shown any skills necessary to lead.
It means that the Democrats are voting for personality, not the best candidate.
2007-01-23 23:32:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Harry Truman was a haberdasher before being tapped from the Congress to be VP and then become President. If someone has the education to understand politics and it's workings, but lacks experience in the political arena, yet has the best intentions for a better U.S. then I would consider that person, no matter waht color he or she is.
2007-01-24 00:52:10 · answer #2 · answered by J.C. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will say what most of you know and few will say. He's getting the attention he is getting because he is young and he is black. Can anyone tell us at least one piece of legislation he has proposed? He has done nothing. He is not qualified to run for president. As one other answer stated Hillary will eat him alive. If he were a white senator he would not even be concidered as a viable canidate.
2007-01-23 23:22:01 · answer #3 · answered by seasonedhusband 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you realize that is 2 years longer than George W Bush, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter, combined, served in congress?
2007-01-23 23:38:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama is a large guy. he's drama and that i admire him. I vote for him and he will guard me AND my youngsters. do no longer ought to concern approximately paying the internal maximum loan or putting gas in my automobile. He must be President for existence! As for that republican Frank, all of us comprehend what he's...
2016-11-01 03:54:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh no, not at all. But sometimes the best way to go is with someone that is still not 100 percent "politician". We need a candidate that still holds to ideals and doesn't pander to others. Obama is fresh, smart, and qualified.
2007-01-23 23:10:12 · answer #6 · answered by MeanKitty 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Vote your conscious but t lest have one. Prejudice nd poor excuses does not rule -- intelligence plus hard work.
2007-01-23 23:20:39 · answer #7 · answered by Sports Maven 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama Bin "Binny" Laden doesn't stand a chance against Hillary. She will chew him up and spit him out. Hillary has Bill to tell her how to do it.
2007-01-23 23:12:02 · answer #8 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wrong again
2007-01-23 23:16:21 · answer #9 · answered by school1859 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,it means you haven't done your homework!
2007-01-23 23:09:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋