JOhn cena or Batista and why
The Hardzy or MNM and why
Mickie or Victoria and why
Undertaker or Kane and why
2007-01-23 22:52:04 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
John Cena - Better promos (by a mile, and a good champ needs to be good on the mic.) Better in ring ability, although they both are not brilliant in the ring, Cena is improving all the time, and he seems to be the one that WANTS to improve, he tries so hard, and will do whatever it takes. Cena gets alot of stick from some fans, but there are much worse wrestlers than him working for the WWE. He is NOT boring, Batista is so boring its unreal, the only thing Batista has is the look. Also he will never make a commentator, did you hear his commentary on Smackdown last week..Shocking! Cena has more intensity, and he can work up the crowd much better than Batista. Batista is in big need of a heel turn in my opinion.
Hardys and MNM is a tough one.
I am going to go with Hardys,but only just. There high flying moves make the hardys, this is what the pair are all about. They have no mic skills but they do not need them. They can perform in any type of match, and put a damn good show on. Jeff is much more over with the crowd than Matt. Jeff could be very succesful on his own, but I dont think Matt can. jeff is much more popular. Matt needs Jeff more than Jeff needs Matt. Never the less they work great together. MNM I also like, they are arseholes yeh, but there heels, theyre meant to been. If you hate them thats good, because your meant too!! Johnny Nitro has huge potential, and could have a long career ahead of him! Mercury could also be good. I felt bad for him after that injury at Armageddon.
Mickie, always! Better looking (shes a diva,thats what theyre all about. Victorias looks only just scrape her in to the 'diva' bracket! Mickie is extreemly popular with the crowd too. I saw her in Manchester at the MEN and she was well over with the crowd. Victoria may have better in ring ability, but this isnt really what the divas are all about.
Undertaker and kane is also tough, but I think Undertaker wins it. He has the intimidation factor, everyone wants to see Taker! Even people who hate wrestling know who the Undertaker is! He has awesome inring ability. He can put a match together so well, and can also make a match look brutal without the use of chairs, weapons etc! His entrance never gets boring, and he is respected so much by everyone. His character is one of the best the WWE has ever had. I just hope they do not take his streak away from him at Mania, that would be a disaster. He has served the WWE brilliantly, and deserves to retire with an unbeaten Wrestlemania record.
great question
2007-01-24 05:30:56 · answer #1 · answered by Deano 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question!!
On overall performance I would have to give Cena the edge over Batista. His mic skills and overall personality come across much stronger and he is an all round entertainer as well as being good in the ring, and that's the way a WWE champion should be IMO. Having said that Batista seems like a great guy, and IS a good wrestler, just doesn't show much personality.
The Hardyz win hands down IMO. Johnny Nitro is a great heel and has come a long way especially recently, but the Hardyz are just so cool and I love their attitude both in and out of the ring, they always bring something a bit special to the matches they are in. I'd like to see Matt get the same push that Jeff has had in the past though!
I find Mickie James really annoying!! Victoria is much more edgy and is a better wrestler IMO. Maybe I just like psychos haha ;)
Hmmm I love both Kane and the Dead Man but I've been a HUGE Undertaker fan for so long now I'd have to back him! :)
2007-01-24 09:19:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did that first guy spell it Fillipino? HAHA dumbazz.
NE Way
-Cena is better on the mic and Batista is better in the ring. Now Batista's in ring performance has been a little off since he returned from his injury. But I'm still giving it to Batista because he has a better look and gimick.
-I am a big fan of Johnny Nitro. Also I think Jeff is not as good as what he used to be and really Matt Hardy has never really entertained me. But the Hardyz in their prime were phenominal. I'll give it to the Hardyz.
-Micki James just annoys me. Victoria playes the psycho yatch very well. Plus she is the only female wrestler with a cool finisher.
- I am a huge fan of both of these wrestlers. Even though Undertakers in ring skills have slowed down quite a bit, he is still one of my favorites to watch. Kane, also has lost some in ring ability, but I think he should get another title run because his one day run is just an insult to such a great wrestler and such a hard worker. Since I can't give a tie, I'm going with Taker just because he has been around longer and has had some of the best fueds in wrestling history.
2007-01-24 03:06:07 · answer #3 · answered by average_joe397 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John Cena/. More entertaining and a better wrestler. Batista is just pushed due to his large size.
The Hardys ofcourse. One of the best tag-teams in the world. Just look at all the ladder matches they have had. MNM needs to accomplish more to make a mark in this business.
Victoria. Has been with the WWE longer and is more experienced.
The Undertaker. Has had more opportunities that Kane. Also is more of a main eventer whereas Kane is a mid-carder.
2007-01-24 01:23:58 · answer #4 · answered by CodeRed 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Batista over Cena, he's an animal
The Hardy's over MNM because they are way more aerial and you never know what the Hardy's are going to pull out on their opponents
Victoria over Mickie, because Victoria is crazy, and can plant some majoy whoop ***
Undertaker, simply because Undertaker can take way more of a beating, Kane is good, but isn't as animated as the Undertaker can get when he's ticked off
2007-01-23 23:00:39 · answer #5 · answered by Lo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Cena - cause Batista is just boring to watch
The Hardyz - cause their really entertaining and put their bodies at risk.
Mickie - cause she's great to watch and a good wwe womens champ
Undertaker & kane - both cause their mostly the same, entertaining
2007-01-24 05:05:35 · answer #6 · answered by Rachel Louise 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Cena all the way becuz he looks much hotter..is a better wrestler and much more entertaining than Batista..
The Hardyz cuz of there Xxtreme matches and also they are much more talented wrestlers than MNM
Mickie cuz i hate Victoria and also cuz shez can wrestle pretty well..
Definately Undertaker cuz hez one of the biggest legends arnd and he is a really great wrestler+he is really entertaining!But i like Kane too..
2007-01-24 01:35:26 · answer #7 · answered by !*ZOEY*! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
awww i cant chose between john cena and batista heheh
The Hardyz cause they are extreme lol
i like them both but i prefer Victoria shes more experienced and from my point of view a better wrestler
Hmmm i prefer kane however the undertaker is a LEGEND!
2007-01-23 23:01:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
A horrible wrestler, or an older horrible wrestler? I'll take the older horrible wrestler with a limited arsenal of moves because he has the cool tattoo. So Batista.
The Hardys because of their "Extreme" nature.
Who really cares, it's women wrestling badly. Um Mickie because I need to pick someone.
Kane had a one day run as WWE Champion. Kane has been able to beat the Undertaker once. Ever. I think we have to go with the DeadMan in this one.
2007-01-23 23:30:21 · answer #9 · answered by lustatfirstbite 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
John Cena because i just like him more
Hardyz because theyre not as***les
Mickie bc i just like her style more
Undertaker because hes a better wrestler and a legen even though kane is pretty good
2007-01-24 01:06:34 · answer #10 · answered by Lava 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋