I truly agree with you as with Steve Nash, he make his whole team the best entertainers with a team show not a one man show. With Amare back, they should be call the team of total basketball.
I believe the MVP title is for the player that makes his team better not a one man show.
But the weird part is Jason Kidd should have got it already as he actually took his team to the NBA Finals twice but he never got it. Very strange indeed how the NBA vote for MVP.
2007-01-24 00:04:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Booooo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's what I see in Nash. Nash is a great player and knows how his teammates move and is adept at predicting where they are going to move to. He has great court vision, which I used to say was in a class by itself, but now I think that Jason Kidd has the same ability. Steve Nash is great at fooling his opponents by no-look passing and other thing. Also, the best thing about Nash is that he's also a great scorer.
2007-01-24 18:22:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by xengold 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i does no longer call what he does cheating in any respect. Fouls are area of the interest, and that they are dealt with as such. Fouls are penalized, and the group fouled will the two get the ball back, or shoot unfastened throws, so it evens out. the different component to evaluate, is that fouls are completely as much as the referees discretion. in case you have a referee who's lenient with the foul calls and shall we lots circulate, then thats his interpretation of what a undesirable is, and it does not make you a cheater to play to the shrink. Its organic in activities to take what you will get, thats no longer cheating. in case you desire to speak approximately cheating, any overall performance improving drugs could be cheating, intentionally injuring one in each and every of the different communities action picture star gamers could be cheating, yet only taking part in the interest isn't. As for why people like him, he's an incredible factor shield. There are not fairly some authentic factor guards anymore, who're large passers and contain the excellent group. He controls the p.c.. of the excellent interest, and forces different communities into extreme scoring shootouts via pressing quickly breaks in transition. He somewhat is an incredible all around factor shield. one greater reason i think of people like him, is that he's the underdog. In a interest ruled via tall black adult males, hes a short white guy from canada, the variety you will in no way assume to be a baller via lookin at him.
2016-12-16 12:19:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by moncalieri 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only reason that Michael Jordan didn't win 5-6 MVPs in a row is because of his obvious leave of absence, and the pity MVPs that were given to Barkley and Malone. Jordan was the true MVP both of those years....
2007-01-24 02:37:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by glazedham42 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The MVP will either go to Nash or Nowitzki for sure. I dont believe Nash is going 3peat, its unheard of especially when he's not a good defender!
2007-01-23 23:00:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I see what you see. It is amazing to see Nash play. But I doubt he makes a 3peat this year. The field is so tough. Could be LeBron or Nowitski this year.
2007-01-24 00:04:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Arnoux 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
steve nash is great I would say he is the comple team player but until he gets a ring he is no GOD Goooo Suns!!!
2007-01-24 05:59:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by blaze67247 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya i mean i love steve nash he's always trying to help every1 else on the team and stuff
2007-01-24 01:28:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by proud muslim and palestinian 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.... Jordan was a basketball god... Nash is good but not anywhere near jordan....
2007-01-23 23:03:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Fixitguy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Agree. A very good team player, which is kinda rare these days...
2007-01-24 01:53:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fattah G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋