which one is better?
2007-01-23 20:11:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Its blasphemy to even ask....
To compare Tolkien with a child that tooks bits and pieces from Tolkien, Salvatore, Moore, Murkok and many others, and created a book of epic fantasy - a genre so saturated during the past years that everything seems to recycle.
There can be no comparisson...
2007-01-23 20:22:45 · answer #1 · answered by kaustikos1981 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lord of the rings is the better book i think. however that doesn't mean I don't like Eragon or Eldest. I love both books, it's just that Lord of the Rings is a classic and an original.
2007-01-23 22:16:13 · answer #2 · answered by Gemma. 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I actually did read the original
Lord Of The Rings trilogy, but I didn't enjoy much. Liked the movie though.
So I would have to say Eragon.
2007-01-23 21:38:49 · answer #3 · answered by novagirl117 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hands down Lord of the Rings...Classic and great to read..The The Chronicles of Narnia are fun and easy reads (compared to Lord of the Rings) as well.
2007-01-24 14:47:18 · answer #4 · answered by joanna_anna7 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lord of the Rings,there no question about it, the only thing in my opinion that even compares to Tolkien's masterpiece is the Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan.
2007-01-24 04:06:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Tolkien gives God a run for his money in creating a believable world in a book. How can Eregon compare?
2007-01-23 20:57:23 · answer #6 · answered by Ghost Writer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOTR without a doubt. Without LOTR there would be no Eragon.
2007-01-24 11:32:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋