I have noticed that some feel our own government was responsible for, and took part in the 9/11 tragedies.?

Question

I'm a newcomer to this theory. Can you enlighten me? Thanks

Answer 1

I was in your shoes a few months back. I found it strange that WTC building 1 and 2 fell so nicely. I then found out that WTC 7 also collapsed in a similar fashion and it was not even hit by a plane. I found it curious that the national media had not reported this fact. I then set out to try to sort out the facts. The following is a summary of what I found. I hope you have a strong stomach, you are going to need it.

___________________________________________

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 2

Most of these people (i am guessing) have seen a little video on google called 9/11 loose change. It gives an extremely compelling look into how the government took part in 9/11. They go very in depth and it truly does make you wonder . . . i mean the only thing it has going against it is that Bush has the brain mass of a fly but this government has gotten away with so much who knows? Just go to google search, type in 9/11 Loose change and watch the video then form your own opinions!! It should be and hour in a half long or at least that is the version i saw!

Answer 3

Unfortunately during the Clinton office time, the White house did receive tips regarding an attack on the united states by Osama Bin Laden, and nothing was done because it was not taken as seriously as should be. You must understand that the government gets thousands of leads and they go after all of them. Unfortunately they did not go after this one, so after the transition to Bush, we were hit and it makes it seem as if our current president is the responsible individual for this attack. We all know that the president to blame is Clinton for not doing much during his presidency. Some people might beg to differ as the economy was in a good shape during his time, but that is because of the internet boom, not Clinton. He decided to not do much other than his own agenda ( Personal that is!) I don't knock him completely but I do believe that President Bush has had to clean up the 8 years of the Clinton terms and deal with his own 8 which you must agree have been very stressful. Our government is not responsible for the attack. Could it have been interrupted? Yes definitly, but that does not mean that because it was not stopped that they were actually aware of the attack and that it could have been avoided. I know this is a lame comparison by far, but if you have ever seen the show "24", you would see that at times the public does not see all that happens behind closed doors, and at times we might not understand them but the decisions are made in the best interest of the country. There are times when the decision is more political than actually what is necessary, but you can normally tell because the American public would give such falsified president great rating because he feeds them the crap they want, unlike President Bush, who has done what is in the best interest of the country. We don't all see what information he receives and deals with daily. If you should have any questions regarding my answer, please feel free to write me. I do belive that 9/11 was a terrible tragedy, but to say the government was responsible for it is a terrible accusation. I would semi-agree that President Clinton should be held responsible for his decision to ignore the lead regarding the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attack.

Answer 4

You will find in life that there are people who will take advantage of any situation to advance their own agenda. So do not be surprised when you hear about aliens from Mars or beyond our own solar system. And also do not be surprised at all of the conspiracy theories advanced by those who would try to place the blame for 9/11 on our own government. Does anyone really believe that so complicated a plan as would be required by the participation of the U.S. Government in this American tragedy could be kept silent? If they do then they should be seeking therapy for their delusions.

Answer 5

well, it's a big can of worms, and it can't be just poo pooed away..I cant necessarily explain the WHY..but if you go to YOU TUBE.COM (sure youve been there?) and find the 9/11 video.(it's located under the sub category (top rated videos).the video clearly shows and explains the clouds of smoke, debrie flyin from the buildings, and such things, and suggests that the clouds were unnatural, and the buildings were Unable to fall as they did without some explosive-type help. Now, did I believe every word spoken in the show? not necessarily, but when you look at some of the footage, and the comparisons are presented smartly, and seemingly in an unbiased fashion, one's gotta think, and at least grant the smallest percentage chance that the conspiracy here might be true!.I just viewed the short film on you tube, and I too, even after watching it, am a bit confused. and, BEWARE!.. this sort of thing just might make you nuts! :)

Answer 6

take a look at both sides:

side 1: says that 19 people not from this country took countrol of major commercial airliners and flew them into 3 of the most influencial and one of them being the heaviest guarded buildings on earth, and not one single person did anything. Even our Pres dispenser figured on finishing his reading to a load of school kids instead of going swiftly back to DC.

Side 2: says the very same thing BUT with one large exception. side 2 says that it is more logical that our Govt' had something to do with it because of the circumstances listed above. How come if it was not our Govt' were we not able, after finding out about the WTC buildings, to get any fighters into the air to protect DC. And how come the section of the Pentagon that was hit was the very section that was going to be investgating more than 2 trilion dollars that Donald Rumsfeld declared missing just one day before from the dept. of defense?

You decide, but I would strogly urge you to look at all the facts. America would not have supported any war on Iraq for no reason, BUT with the loss of 3,000 fellow Americans, we would happily carpet bomb the hell out of anyone mentioned! No questions asked.

It is time for the internet to have a real place for us to debate the world's issues in a civilized manner.
http://www.sarcasticgazette.com

Answer 7

Hello,

Here is a video by Alex Jones you can watch about 9/11 called TerrorStorm. This pretty much sums up what our government is doing to us and other citizens of the world.

This "attack" on 9/11 had been planned since 1973.

Consipracy, yes, theory, no.

I am a conservative Christian who loves her country, and it took me until 2003 to finally see the light. I began listening to various Christian talk shows where the hosts speak to guests who are "in the know" about what our 'leaders' are doing to us on a daily basis to make us submit to them.

9/11 was just the beginning of what is yet to come, i.e. NATFA Superhighways, National ID's and the coming North American Union

Hope this helps you.............. : -O

Answer 8

I have heard this theory before and even been shown some "evidence" behind it all, but don't believe it much.
It's true that a lot of governments stage certain things like the Twin Towers to benefit their own agenda, to coerce the public into things they normally would rise up against, even using it as an act to go to war over, when it wasn't justified, but the theory of government officials secretly planting bombs in each of the Towers is not justified for me to believe, and consipracy theories these days are cropping up about just about anything you can imagine.

Answer 9

I wrote an essay with all sources listed on www.geocities.com/[e-mail]/blac.html
leave blac.html out for video links on 1st page.

Basically, there is only one explanation for 9/11. The buildings were brought down with explosives. Here is an interesting site that could help you put things in perspective (below)

They use phrases like "The buildings, up to 300 ft in length in some cases, fell quickly and CDI’s preparation design resulted in superb breakage which will facilitate the fast-track debris removal required by ODDC to meet the site clearance schedule."

Answer 10

There are always people who want to trump up some conspiracy theory or claim that it never happened at all. That it was a trick. But those who experienced it first hand know that our government would never perpetrate such a horrible act. Just as those who experienced various holocausts around the world like the Nazi blood baths know that they happened.

I have an acquaintance who did not believe the first landing on the moon and thought the videos were all a hoax. I guess some people just want to make trouble or are so skeptical or cynical that they make outrageous things up despite what they see with their own eyes.

Answer 11

Go to www.st911.org...it will has a lot of information about that subject. It is a site run by families of the victims of 9/11 who have lots of questions that they want answered. Check out the Loose Change video...it's a good place to start, and work your way around the site. Very eye-opening, I promise. Good luck on your search for the truth :o).