English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I will believe Flight 77 hit the pentagon, When I see it from those survallance tapes.

2007-01-23 19:07:30 · 7 answers · asked by truth 1 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

There is strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a (DU) type missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

2007-01-24 16:14:00 · answer #1 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 0 0

A missle hitting the pentagon is a very unlikely scenario. Highly doubt it.. There are other factors about 9/11 that I can not help but to question though. Mainly WTC 7.. I'm still having a hard time grasping why that building fell like that..

2007-01-23 19:13:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Flight 77.

2007-01-23 19:12:19 · answer #3 · answered by Max 6 · 0 1

It was on television LIVE...an airplane hit it, flight 77

2007-01-23 19:16:42 · answer #4 · answered by Chris B 4 · 0 1

then watch the tape and if it was a missile why didn't it explode when it knock over those light posts and there are people that said they saw a jet

2007-01-23 19:12:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Hello,

I agree with you 100%.

In the meantime, check out this link showing a two-faced pig and then you tell me our other governments are not playing God and creating little Frankensteins.

Hope this helps you................: - O

2007-01-23 19:35:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It was tottally some kind of aircraft,big government cover up.boo to them.

2007-01-23 19:21:44 · answer #7 · answered by soulsista20 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers