Instead of different nations, different defence forces, different currency, different rules, why don't we think about a world government elected by the people of entire world, for co-existance of entire mankind, live together with peace and share the wealth of earth.
2007-01-23 17:28:04 · 6 answers · asked by Kannan 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
What difference would it make? Their would still be fighting and bickering.
2007-01-23 17:43:25 · answer #1 · answered by o 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many live in suspicion and fear of such a thing due to prophesy. That a terrible leader will take over the World. But when his time comes, he will take over no matter what, so I don't personally
understand the paranoia about it.
I think t would be better to come together now as a World Society, in cooperation. And maybe take some of the sting out of any dictators reign. Otherwise, we will forced into a World Society anyway through our suspicions and fear.
2007-01-24 05:41:03 · answer #2 · answered by Sadeek Muhammad 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In India we had Joint Hindu Family to show coexistence. Whereas Westerns do not have such system. When people belonging to the same family can not live together, how do you expect people of different continents, races etc live together harmoniously?
2007-01-24 01:52:33 · answer #3 · answered by ravipati 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
'World government' has been under discussion time and again. But before hat let us have a true national government of the people, for the people and by the people.
2007-01-24 04:32:31 · answer #4 · answered by gupta_uncle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because every country would have to learn how to respect every other country before that could happen.
2007-01-24 01:32:30 · answer #5 · answered by Exanthem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HMMM... GOOD POINT. BECAUSE WE ARE HUMAN BEINGS WHO ARE SELFISH.
2007-01-24 01:31:08 · answer #6 · answered by MADDY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋