This shows that creatively they have no clear direction. In WWE's hey day, they would have storylines planned out from beginning to end, occasionally tweaking them if they felt that a particular angle was not getting over.
Now it seems as if they are just throwing shows and angles together at the last minute without having a plan. And if something doesn't work, they just add more people or stipulations to mathces to make them seem exciting. It's really sad that a multi-million dollar company doesn't even have enough foresight to know what is going to happen next week with its number one product.
2007-01-23 17:29:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I Haven't Really Cared For WWe Television Lately ... I'm More Into TNA At The Moment Due To Stale Storylines In WWE Angles.
2007-01-23 17:27:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by DeadSurvivor 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The two people above me are obviously titty suckers of faces such as Cena.
If you enjoy Vince destroying ECW then forget you, and go onto the commercialized bull that Vince is pulling.
Just remember this folks, VINCE KILLED ECW. ECW should have been done for and over in 2001 but he brings it back to not just kill it, but to destroy it.
Now if only Sabu and RVD, Sandman can get their heads out of their asses and move to TNA, we will have more barbwire, more weapons, more highflying moves onto tables and ****, it will be back to the original extreme.
TNA knows EXTREME. Vince hires too many ******* like Cena who are afraid to go jump off of ladders, and onto tables and sort of things like that; afraid to get a scratch on them.
WWE CHAMP - Are you fucccccccking kidding me!? The street fight was one of the best fights ever? When the hell did you start watching wrestling? Have you ever watched Tazz vs. Sabu, Summerslam in 98, and that was The ladder match between Rock and HHH for the Intercontinental Championship? Hell in a Cell 97? Anything is better than that weak *** Street Fight.
Damn you guys dont know anything about wrestling!
2007-01-23 19:02:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lunatic 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Honestly, it's not that bad, and I'm big on protecting PPV matches and trying to build a good buyrate, but with this match being at the Royal Rumble, where it'll take a back seat to the Rumble match, and the other title matches, it really shouldn't hurt them.
2007-01-23 17:57:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by combat_rock_1981 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
They dont care.
Theyre resting on the fact that theyve been around for 3 decades and people will watch anyways.
But at least after 2 days of mediocre wwe programming TNA is on at a special time Wed @ 10 !!!!
2007-01-23 17:26:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by anonymous w 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
it is just that vince mcmahon wants to spit in the face of ECW he hated how amazingly dangerously crazy it used to be and he was jelous that wwe could never come close to the things the old ECW did. so since he bought it he wants to humiliate ecw in his own way by making it another version of a crappy smackdown and get crappy wwe wrestlers to be in ecw. that is why you have bad fights and boring fights between wrestlers like cm skunk, test, lashley, elijah burke, and that idiot matt striker.
btw i checked on raw vince said there is nothing that trump has more than vince. but i checked vince's networth is $$700 million and trump's networth is 4.2 billion. so vince shouldn't compare himself to donald.
2007-01-23 17:26:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
They are starting to care.Forget ECW,did u watch the Street FIght match between HBK and Edge?It was so freakin' awesome.One of the best matches ever!!!
2007-01-24 01:31:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by WWE Champ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
theyre desperate. the good starts are leaving so theyre exploiting what they got into new characters. WWE is going through a really bad time right now.
2007-01-23 17:24:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
they don't give a rat hinepart.any more as long as there pockets are full
2007-01-23 17:26:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by ED S 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
it matters
2007-01-23 22:50:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by BIGGEST RED DEVIL 4
·
1⤊
0⤋