2007-01-23 17:15:23 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
NO.
2007-01-23 17:18:24 · answer #1 · answered by neooxyconservative 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah why not and see what happens.
I doubt whether Bush would do that.
Tell you what, why not go and protest in front of the White House and say how much you want to nuke Iran and Iraq and solve the problems once and for all.
Bush's policies are the biggest threat to world peace.
2007-01-23 17:19:16 · answer #2 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance, that is not the way it would work anyway they are not rubber dummies it is not that easy, We would have to evacuate first? And then what? The destruction would be enormous and effects would be tragic for many other countries in the surrounding areas. Smart bombs yes, but that is being done already. We need to play it by ear right now and that is the way that congress wants it, so it will take about two months before they decide?
2007-01-23 17:24:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe they should leave taking with them all the innocent ones and those that want nothing to do with the fighting and leave Iran and Iraq to sort themselves out. They will probably kill each other till there is no one left ,or one or the other will finally give up. I think they will go on for ever till there is no one left. Very sad when you think about it.
2007-01-23 17:27:37 · answer #4 · answered by Alwyn C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well remember Pearl Harbor? Japan attacked the US. We dropped a couple of bombs on them. They surrender. Now they are a major trading partner. In fact what reason do have to be over there anyway besides the oil. If there was no oil we could have cleaned up that mess a long time ago.
2007-01-23 18:32:14 · answer #5 · answered by gates_goins 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will be quite fun at first, all those fireworks and such. But when the rest of the world sends a few our way in fear that we have lost our minds and they are next, it won't be as much fun.
Do that and Russia and China both will launch at us. Maybe a few others (like North Korea, India, and Pakistan). Trying that will be the end of America as a power (and maybe as a country at all).
2007-01-23 17:19:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
wow ducky you sure got "dead man"s er balls in an uproar! lol Dead man may a perverted muslim roto rooter man try and fix your daughters plumbing! No nukes yet but it's an idea that will never be totally put out of the mix....
2007-01-23 18:06:28 · answer #7 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey! That's a sure way to defeat the enemy. And while we are at it let's nuke France.
2007-01-23 18:33:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll give you the obvious answer: No. That would be a bad idea.
Even Cheney would be against it. Think of all the oil fields that would become so radioactive they couldn't be used.
2007-01-23 18:22:56 · answer #9 · answered by Viktor Bout 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes we should leave it but just leave no nukes
2007-01-23 17:20:03 · answer #10 · answered by melissa s 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO You f ucker! U,nited.S,hits of.A,ss shouldn't even exist!
U.S. should leave the middile east and the rest of the world!
I hop a thousand Scud missiles carreing deadly TOXINS would bomb your S,hit a,ss country!
P.S. I laughed when 9\11 happend I laughed a laugh of joy!hahaha! F uck you a ss holes!
2007-01-23 17:26:27 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋