2007-01-23 16:57:53 · 6 answers · asked by fukawthoridy 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No one has the guts to do it in the near future. It would be political suicide. Perhaps in 50 years or so people might see that the billions spent on the "war on drugs" have been wasted and a new direction must be taken.
2007-01-23 18:21:18 · answer #1 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see from your question bio's drugs are big with you,hope it doesnt catch up to you,as for pot,it does effect the brain in ways that can harm,but then again so does alcohol,until they can figure out a way to test you on the highway to see if your under the influence(since marijuana stays in your system at levels that give a false positive)they cant prove how long ago you smoked,when they do,they'll change the policy
2007-01-23 17:06:00 · answer #2 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither! Both sides enjoy compaign contributions from drug companies. Both sides enjoy calling the companies at a moments notice to use their corporate jets. Don't think either side is going to be giving up any of those perks anytime soon.
2007-01-23 17:14:15 · answer #3 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully the next ones elected...
2007-01-23 17:02:54 · answer #4 · answered by trishay831 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Willie Nelson or Scott Weiland probably.....I think they are running in 2012
2007-01-23 17:02:34 · answer #5 · answered by JR 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A stinking hippy. But a hippy is not as leader. A hippy is a follower....a sheep.
2007-01-23 17:02:36 · answer #6 · answered by Tropical Weasel 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋