The only thing he talked was the old story of hijackers freedom and troop expansion,in other words he was singing the same swan song.What do you say?
2007-01-23 16:01:48 · 6 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Promises said to be broken.
2007-01-23 16:05:11 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He focused more on the domestic issues and I'm glad he did that. We needed that kind of emphasis. I do see that as an advantage to having the Democrats in power. It's good to have balance.
When the story of the hijackers is no longer important, we will drop our guard and be hit again. It's something to never forget.
2007-01-24 00:07:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It was a very benign speech with no real substance except for his insistance on another surge of troops into Iraq. Even his fellow Repubs are not supporting him. Sen. Webb's speech was much better.
2007-01-24 00:13:01 · answer #3 · answered by notyou311 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree. One thing i noticed and thought funny was that when the camera went out to the audience they were all sleeping. HA!HA! When it was on Obama (asleep), then on McCain (asleep), then on Kennedy (he too looked to be sleeping). And to think one of them may be our future president. On the other hand though Hillary was wide awake.
2007-01-24 00:09:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree Doc!
Hey have you noticed anyone missing here in the last month or so?? ;o) Hmm, I wonder how that happened...
2007-01-26 23:21:21 · answer #5 · answered by TJTB 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you can't say anything good, don't say anything at all, my mother always said
2007-01-24 00:07:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋