2007-01-23 15:49:35 · 14 answers · asked by Ollo312 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
After an offender has paid his debt to society, I believe he should be given a second chance.
2007-01-23 15:53:14 · answer #1 · answered by Ti 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No they earned them and you never know,
maybe they were wrongly convicted very few have any experience with the criminal Justice system. And if your alone, middle class working honest decent folk. BEWARE< often it seems although there are a great deal of good cops out there risking their lives in the line of duty to help others.
Not all have learned how to say :Im sorry" should they make a mistake in a false arrest.Studies in Universities have shown we have an extimated 200,000 thousand innocent people in the prison systems, So no a Doctor whose been convicted still could save your life in an emergency. What would you say during your heart atack or the seizure of a loved one, hey hold on a sec you dont have your title dont touch me ! LOL
2007-01-23 15:56:43 · answer #2 · answered by jigadee 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think they should. Bestowing of a title is an honour and they are dishonourable if they are convicted criminals.
2007-01-23 18:48:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there should be a scale.. because the punishment petred out these days is simply not fair..
To begin with the biggest punishment is loss of freedom.. then loss of assets..
Rich people can commit crimes.. and get no sentence and a smallish fine.. this is not punishment for the rich..
Simularly.. poor people cop fines they cant pay.. then end up in prison.. also not fair..
I think the richer the person is.. the more he should pay in damages.. for any crime committed.. poor people should be helped when they commit crimes.. because poor people often NEED to commit crimes to survive..
rich people commit crimes out of greed and often are to blame that there are so many poverty cases now.. so I think rich people should loose titles and whatever they have if they commit major crimes of greed..
2007-01-23 16:23:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're so remarkable. because of the fact the asserting is going, "Haters hate," and there is a number of it against prisoners. I used to instruct in a Florida detention center. situations there could wring tears from a stone statue, IMO. maximum of my pupils have been youthful young babies, interior the 18-25 age selection. They did dumb issues, merely like my young babies did, different than they have been unlucky adequate to get caught at it. So unhappy. of course there are disgusting human beings in prisons. yet there are the two disgusting human beings outdoors of prisons. i assume it extremely is truly trouble-free for human beings to stereotype "all" prisoners, that they simply won't be able to stand as much as the no longer-having-to-think of-approximately-it element. unhappy.
2016-11-26 22:30:56 · answer #5 · answered by akkash 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes is the only good answer. If they have been convicted of a crime, and it goes for sporting titles as well as MBE's OBE's and so on.
No second chance..............Hang um that's what I say lmao
2007-01-23 18:45:25 · answer #6 · answered by si n 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
jigadee has a good point. and lets not forget some of the criminal desitions made by politicaly motivated judges, judges who make desitiones that favour the guilty over the innocent.
2007-01-23 16:41:23 · answer #7 · answered by trucker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you mean like phd or medical degree titles?
i don't think that they should unless the crime was directly related to whatever degree they have, and even then i don't think they should be stripped of the title because they did earn it at one point
2007-01-23 15:58:16 · answer #8 · answered by jdphd 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and their family jewels confiscated by the state!
2007-01-23 16:05:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What sort of title?
2007-01-23 16:19:45 · answer #10 · answered by counterculturalist 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋