People use all kind of insulting descriptives to demean those who disagree with them. It is a classic bullying tactic designed to shame the opposition into silence. That's also why they used words like racists, fascist, islamophobes, etc... Those tactics are use by all sides.
2007-01-23 15:45:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
All opinions are good for the country. As an American we have the right to pursue happiness. Say what is on your mind even if nobody agrees. At some point you may feel inclined to rethink your opinion and that is OK after all you have the right.
2007-01-23 15:46:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pablo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you need to end examining a Russian's (Ayn Rand) interpretation of Anglo-American political custom. i think of you need to learn the political philosophy at the back of the invoice of Rights (the English theory-approximately Freedom which formed the Founders political philosophy). interior the classic English concept of freedom, your rights have been something that sprang from being born into an area of "freemen/yeomen." in case you weren't born to this community, you weren't loose - and subsequently did no longer carry rights. you need to circulate back a minimum of to the Magna Carta. The "guy or woman" has truthfully no longer something to do with this. If the invoice of Rights became approximately "guy or woman rights" as you declare, then they might have utilized to women and slaves - which for sure isn't what the Founders did. Why? simply by fact women and slaves weren't born into the community of freemen. See how that works? The invoice of Rights is approximately retaining the rights of freemen, and those rights are derived - no longer from the sake of being somebody - yet because you have been born into an area of freemen. The invoice of Rights - once you are going to be honest approximately it - is approximately retaining the rights you derive from being a factor of a loose community. with out the guy, rights nonetheless exist. yet, with out the community, rights soften right into a mist. (The incredibly exciting concern approximately your view of all this, is that the translation of rights which you wrongly think of is traditionally precise, became particularly stepped forward in the process the imaginitive era...greater often than not by using Socialists. i detect it humorous which you incredibly embody socialism on an identical time as denegrating it.)
2016-12-12 19:02:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The fact that a person does research does not make him an expert. Bush does research all the time and it always turns out to be a wrong and the American people look like idiots.
2007-01-23 15:41:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by George B 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
An Educated Rebel... of which i am proud to be one to...
Hay folk's... not all the people who disagree with the president are liberals!...sorry
2007-01-23 15:47:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by no one here gets out alive 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Disagreement with a President will affect the decisions of the latter.
2007-01-23 15:41:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The people who live in reality and not a delusional pipe dream. Believing in Bush and his falsehoods comes from a lack of reasoning of the facts. He cons people into believing he's doing things in the name of "American Prowess". Battle cries, the red white and blue, yadda yadda yadda...and then he leaves out the reality---Steal Oil, Raid the Treasury, Defund Social programs, tax-breaks for the top 3%, ---And people fall for that crap--ey yiy yia!!
Nice Speech? Great beginning, great ending, nothing in between.
2007-01-23 15:41:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by scottyurb 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Majority of the country?
The results of last November's elections seem to indicate otherwise.
2007-01-23 15:41:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
intellectuality superior.
2007-01-23 15:40:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
ANSWER: A TYPICAL LOSER LIBERAL
That was easy points.
2007-01-23 15:40:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋