The man is wondering if it will add satisfaction to either or both the husband and the wife if the man was circumcised. The husband is willing if it will add pleasure to their sexual life. Would it be too late to consider circumcision? Or, is it still necessary?
2007-01-23 14:07:33 · 20 answers · asked by The Curious 1 in Health ➔ Men's Health
According to a studt cited by Dr. Dean Edell, circumcision actually significantly reduces sexual pleasure for women http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html
And most men who have had the procedure wish they had not. Take a look at http://www.norm.org
2007-01-24 04:17:27 · answer #1 · answered by Maple 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I chose to be circumcised at age 40. There was no medical reason, but my wife suggested it and I was happy to comply. It was one of the best things that I have ever done! Sexual sensation is so much better for both the man and his female partner when the man is circumcised. So the answer to your question is YES - it will add pleasure to their sex life and it's never too late to be circumcised. As I said, I had my first circumcision at 40 and I had a recircumcision last year at age 61, to make my circumcision tighter. The result is fantastic for both my wife and me. Tell the man to go ahead -he will never regret it!
2007-01-23 23:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I too was circumcized as an adult but at age 28 which was over ten yrs ago now - one of the BEST things I've ever done, that is my experience.
My Ex girlfriend & were both hesitant as both families all had their foreskins. If I had've listened to the anti circ CRAP on the net I might've not of got circumcized.
My EX - GF AFTER I was circed thought I felt bigger - we both reasoned it was coz there was less skin thus making my penis feel bigger with less movement.
I now enjoy both oral sex & handjobs more AFTER being circumcized coz the head of my penis isn't always covered with foreskin thus making my penis head sensitive from the moisture.
My EX GF also gave me both oral & handjobs MORE OFTEN - she also commented that I didn't smell like I had before getting circed. She also swore she'd get all her sons circed in future.
Beneifts are
No smegma
No smell I used to smell only 1/2 an hour after washing underneath my foreskin.
I can now pee straight having NO foreskin
Gee I miss having pubes get caught in my foreskin - NOT
Gee I miss having my foreskin get caught in zippers - NOT!!!
I reckon my orgasms are way more intense now than before being circumcized.
Have a little bit of skin still on the side of my penis which I might get taken off & re-circumcized like the guy above who did at 61. That's my only regret is not getting it done tighter as I wasn't aware of different styles & cuts.
So my answer is YES it does most certainly add pleasure - GET IT DONE - tighter the better.
2007-01-24 00:53:45 · answer #3 · answered by Chris L 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, no, no, no, no. It will be the other way around, the man will lose sensitivity and pleasure. The woman gains nothing. If he's having sexual problems (such as premature ejaculation), he needs some other kind of intervention rather than cut up a dick that served him well for 50 years.
2007-01-23 14:12:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has the choice to do it or not. It is not proven either way whether a man experiences more pleasure with or without his foreskin.
I've heard that uncircumcised men experience more pleasure that men that are circumcised.
I personally do not think he should do it unless he is experiencing frequent infections.
2007-01-23 14:12:44 · answer #5 · answered by emaaaazing! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe it is necessary. My husband is not circumsized and we have a great sex life. My husband checked into getting a circumcision done because someone told him it would be better and his doctor told him it would be very painful and unnecessary.
2007-01-23 14:12:54 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its not necessary and is stupid and will not give any more pleasure in fact less for the man since the head of the penis will become less sensitive since it would no longer be protected by your foreskin.
2007-01-23 14:12:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT IS NEVER NEVER NEVER NECESSARY. What are you smoking? Every man is born with a foreskin. The foreskin is the most nerve-rich portion of a man's body. Sex with a foreskin is more pleasurable for BOTH the man and the female partner. The whole reason people are angry about being circumcised is because they've lost so much sensitivity. Impotence does NOT occur in natural males--only in kerotinized, desensitized mutilated men do you find such things!
2007-01-23 14:10:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The man who is not circumcized is more sensitive sexually in those areas... whereas the women usually prefer the man to be circumsized... physically I don't think it makes a difference... don't make the decision based on that.
2007-01-23 14:12:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Have the wife try a cut one, and see if she likes it. He might want to be there to watch and take notes.
2007-01-23 14:11:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋