You clearly want to communicate to whoever will read you that the people with whom you have a supposed disagreement are wrong and you are right. But isn't "Why do liberals hate America?" or "Why do Neocons love war and killing?" pretty transparently desperate? Have you read enough to broach a real concrete issue, and are you brave enough to seek a close give-and-take dialog on a subject about which you feel strongly?
Today would be a great day to change the way we talk to each other on YAnswers. Agree?
2007-01-23 13:38:33 · 8 answers · asked by martino 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's it, isn't it Anya? --And people get so wrapped up in their little role which someone else dictated to them.
2007-01-23 13:54:33 · update #1
the one thing that makes government officials shake in their boots is us getting together. So they divide us. They have done a really good job.
2007-01-23 13:44:13 · answer #1 · answered by anya_mystica 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
correction... he had the manage of the Fox station in his vehicle. The police have not defined that as he become targeted on Fox, because there is not any evidence both way of that. If Fox is retaining this as they were targeted.. then they do no longer understand this in any respect,. This guy served penitentiary time for movements touching on to his anti authorities stance. If he were a liberal.. seems logical that he would have voted for Obama, no longer which include him as a hate target. they don't look to be assuming him to be appropriate wing. The evidence obviously backs it up, and it is from the police, no longer some internet debate. As for the rampant arguments that the left is indignant about this and the Tiller shooting.. both Roeder and Von Brunn would usually be seen your average white Christian male (or it particularly is how they observed themself). The shooter in Arkansas is time-honored to have educated lower than Muslim leaders, so the history is clearly distinct. no longer more suitable or worse.. yet distinct. I gained't dispute interior the least that there are terrorists on both the left and the right. i will not argue or declare that each and each body conservatives are extremists or able to homicide. i will assert, that the dhs document obviously suggested what the fashion of human being become, who will be a violent family members terrorist. They under no circumstances claimed all conservatives were terrorists... it particularly is purely the manipulation positioned on the document, deliberately. This guy and Roeder were appropriate wing extremists..and obviously, see no longer something incorrect with being that.. or killing somebody else for his or her political statements. what's worse? i do no longer see a unmarried human being operating round attempting to declare that the shooter in Arkansas become probably a hero. We advantageous have seen a tremendous number of that with Roeder, and likely obtainable for VonBrunn as well. all of us who claims distinct is a blatant liar.
2016-10-16 00:32:52 · answer #2 · answered by digman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nice thought but it isn't going to happen. Too many people not willing to consider how the other side views things.
2007-01-23 13:44:31 · answer #3 · answered by Sir Alex Awesome Valentine, Esq. 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yawn. I miss the old boards.
2007-01-23 13:41:57 · answer #4 · answered by Skeezix 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rodney, "Why can't we just get along?"
It's the nature of the game, do want to play or just sit and watch?
2007-01-23 13:45:50 · answer #5 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It won't stop no matter how much you plead.
I'm guilty as hell of it, but mostly because I like to get Democrats riled up.
2007-01-23 13:42:56 · answer #6 · answered by The Cult of Personality 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no
if you add in getting rid of questions with Bush, then yes, there would be no questions here
2007-01-23 13:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely.
how can we expect our leaders to get along if we can't get along ourselves?
2007-01-23 13:53:07 · answer #8 · answered by political junkie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋