English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

whats worse tna or saturday night live? they both have a lot in common like bad ratings, performers are horrible at doing their jobs, get destroyed by their competition each week, have been on tv longer than their supposed to, and will no longer be in business in the future. what do you think?

2007-01-23 13:00:47 · 9 answers · asked by BOB 6 in Sports Wrestling

9 answers

those are opinions not facts TNA has better preformers the WWE IMO.

2007-01-23 13:05:31 · answer #1 · answered by RaizenX 2 · 0 1

Mr. E Punk Is Champ The ANTI Bears RKOLegacy Masked Nightmare Rock N Wrestling And group Congrats To Dragon!!! PROMO: What interior the Hell is this? as quickly as returned we ought to stand The Losers Of The PPV? Stewie, You lost Your tournament, recover from It And pass On. no one Cares approximately You Or the international Is Ours. The Wave Of the destiny Is certainly the way forward for The YWWA, and you Hypocrites are unlikely to end Us!

2016-11-01 03:10:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Tna=better wrestling than wwe

wwe=Better Storylines than TNA

If you're like me I watch WWE for the storylines, not wrestling, since u know whos gunna win

2007-01-23 14:14:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

SNL TNA is at least trying to put out a decent product

2007-01-23 14:09:50 · answer #4 · answered by Corey B 3 · 0 0

well think of it like this smackdown having to tape cheering crowds, from raw, bc smackdown sucks. rather see bad performers and ratings than FAKE crowd cheers!!!

2007-01-23 14:22:37 · answer #5 · answered by corbett d 1 · 0 0

I have no idea.sorry

2007-01-23 13:05:20 · answer #6 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 0 1

WHAT ??????

2007-01-23 13:16:26 · answer #7 · answered by 5 · 0 1

?????

2007-01-23 13:13:46 · answer #8 · answered by I luv batista 3 · 0 1

dunno

2007-01-23 13:04:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers