2007-01-23 11:40:01 · 9 answers · asked by dank_vile 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
If I have no choice how can I choose not to? The question is moot.
2007-01-23 11:47:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Assuming that the way you've worded your question is to put people in the (unlikely) position that they have no choice other than to run over one of the four, then the obvious one is the pope. After all, he believes in an after-life with great rewards and ought therefore to be hankering after it already ...
2007-01-23 19:49:14 · answer #2 · answered by mrsgavanrossem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Answer A would be the pope. he's already lived a vast majority of his life. Answer B would be the little old lady for much the same reason.
2007-01-23 19:46:13 · answer #3 · answered by fred c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most people would say the Pope. Martyrdoom..
2007-01-23 19:48:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question isn't worded well. I think you are asking if you did have a choice, which would you run over. Am I right? The correct answer is that you don't have a choice, so you would run over whichever one is in the way.
2007-01-23 19:46:50 · answer #5 · answered by Jan C 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No...I dont think I could ive with myself if Itook any innocent life, especially a toddler or pregant women.
2007-01-23 20:21:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the pope,he have lived long enough
2007-01-23 19:45:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-01-23 19:48:55 · answer #8 · answered by daddio 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the pope.
i'm probably goin down to he** anyway! hehehehe
2007-01-23 19:47:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋