2007-01-23 11:27:54 · 9 answers · asked by Reo 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
It depends more on the script and acting, I think. A good budget can help things along, but it doesn't make the movie.
2007-01-23 11:41:41 · answer #1 · answered by piratewench 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It just depends on what you are trying to accomplish. Sometimes you need certain equipment or a bigger budget for the things you want to do. It can affect the quality but it's not everything. There are usually ways around it if you're skilled.
2007-01-23 12:23:44 · answer #2 · answered by V.V.C. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes ..just look at Orson Wells carer...when he became a outcast..he only had the money to do B movies thoe he did a pretty good job..he mostly could have used the extra cash to get sOme really Good actors and actress
2007-01-23 13:42:37 · answer #3 · answered by sea 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. It's the script, acting and directing that make a quality movie. Remember, script is king!
2007-01-23 11:44:34 · answer #4 · answered by SLUG 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
(:
Well I guess think about it this way:
If you make a movie with only 2,000 dollars to buy everything, and pay your actors, how would it compare to a movie with a 2 million dollar budget?
2007-01-23 11:31:36 · answer #5 · answered by Brooke 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not so much, if the plot and all around script is strong...the budget will be strong.
2007-01-23 11:33:28 · answer #6 · answered by artgirl11 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably a little but i think a good script low budget or not would be quaility in its self.
2007-01-23 11:31:04 · answer #7 · answered by ~*These Blue Eyes Tell No Lies*~ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For lighting, special effects, scenery, sound, yes. For acting, no.
2007-01-23 11:31:53 · answer #8 · answered by lulu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Rocky was shot for $1M.
Heaven's Gate was close to $150M
2007-01-23 11:38:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋