I am doing a report on the No Child Left Behind Act and I would like to know what people think about it.?

Answer 1

The idea was not a bad one, but badly executed. First, by tying funding to test scores, schools learned that if the students did well on the tests they got money, even if they learned nothing the rest of the year. Second, schools that are having problems are the ones who need money and help, not a loss of revenue and to be threatened with take over or closure. Lastly, all the proposals cost money, yet the White House did not provide the funds to implement them, yet punished the schools if they did not. This caused many schools to end after school programs, arts and music programs, and delay or cancel needed equipment.

Answer 2

It's great in theory, but it’s not working.

In my state what the school has basically done to get these kids to pass is lower the standards. And the kids that were actually on grade level are now falling behind because the teachers have to spend so much time trying to get the ones who were behind back on track, that the other kids are just sitting in class all day reviewing what they already know and not learning a thing. And forget separating the classes by ability, because that might ‘damage’ the children’s self-esteem if they figure out that they’re in the ‘below grade level’ class.

So, how did the school end up with so many kids below grade level? Because they were pushing them through the system. The policy of the elementary schools here is that they will not hold a child a back more than once (again, because doing that might damage their self-esteem), so rather the child actually passed or not, they sent them to the next grade. So they ended up with kids starting middle school (6th grade) who could barely read on a 2nd grade level.

Of course, there are lots of other factors that come into play too, such as lack of parental involvement…and I’m talking about things as simple as making sure your child does their homework (obviously, not the case will all parents, but with some), children starting school who can barely speak a word of English (that’s a big problem where I live, and it’s hard to teach a child if they don’t speak the language that you’re speaking), etc.

Answer 3

i feel that they leveled the playing field to such an extent, basically dumbing things down to the lowest denominator that it left no room for the REALLY bright ones, or the ones that can do well with a bit f encouragement.

The aim is to get in a set amount of facts and figures with NO room left for any personal development either as a student or from the teachers aspect.

Good idea in theory BUT like said above pretty much doomed to failure from the start, maybe next time they need to ask the grass roots people [ie teachers and educators] and NOT pencil pushers that think stats are the be all and end all.

Answer 4

HAHAHAHAHA!!! Please excuse me on a similar time as I seize my breath... *cough* ok. nicely, to place it actual, it is an unmitigated catastrophe. It hasn't raised standards - it is decreased them substantially. A scholar hasn't been at college for a super form of the 12 months, or is failing each project? Oh nicely, shove him directly to the subsequent grade point, and enable that instructor handle him. That poor scholar will conflict (and probable be a habit situation to distract the instructor from his loss of means), yet a minimum of he would be together with his associates. you does not choose to harm the scholar's psyche, or make idiots think of it is the college's fault the scholar is failing... as a replace of letting instructors do their jobs properly, making effective scholars are extremely getting to grasp what they could desire to earlier going up a grade point, the emphasis is on passing all scholars. it is all approximately standardized assessments; "teach for the try", get super stats printed interior the paper, and all is sturdy. Who cares approximately the rest? The No toddler Left in the back of Act is a gaggle of BS... in case you opt for actual solutions to this query from the folk this crappy Act impacts on a every day foundation, attempt asking interior the "coaching" area. Rainmaker - The NEA is getting money? seeing that whilst? the place is that money, then, interior the colleges? As a facet notice, in case you extremely think of the Michigan Lottery's proceeds bypass to the colleges, I unquestionably have a bridge to Canada to sell you - i'm going to throw interior the matching tunnel for unfastened. : ( Jeeper - of direction instructors are apprehensive approximately looking undesirable! think of you have been coaching for 30 years, executed an dazzling interest the full time, and no you will criticize how sturdy you're. You teach scholars the smart qualifications they choose, and assessments are just to ascertain that means - not the emphasis. Then, in comes NCLB - all that means and journey is thrown out the window. you will extra desirable retire, adapt to the hot regime/standards, or settle for being fired for incompetence... the way colleges are actually, the sturdy instructors are being pushed off and the hot instructors are all techniques-washed into believing NCLB is the main outstanding element seeing that sliced bread. it is not a count of firing the "unethical" instructors/directors. Eh, call me bitter and supply me thumbs-downs. this is the fact of the placement; ask around as a replace of unquestioningly believing what the government or the information feeds you.

Answer 5

I think it's a set up for future failure. Kids who pass no matter what don't learn what they need to learn to progress in school. They also give the kid the idea that if things are too hard in life, you don't have to do them. Children need to be raised with challenges to know that hard work will get them ahead and is not the advantage of birth. I see kids who were coddled by their parents and the school system in the work force now who think it unfair and unjust when someone talks to them for showing up to work late. It's what they were taught. All else at the expense of their little feelings. The future needs to be prepared not shown a golden path to a welfare state.

Answer 6

Instead of forcing government accountibility to bring schools up to standards, they are closed... it has never been fully funded and there is too much emphasis on testing and memorizing, not enough teaching going on. Teachers need flexibility especially in poorly performing schools-it's a fact that schools really need creativity and this discourages it. The schools that most need help are instead closing-very sad.

Answer 7

Wife's a teacher..does not like it...creates mandates but did not provide funding.