English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

who here thinks that the last horcrux is harry's scar?
my theory is:
dumbledore said voldemort left part of himself in harry when he tried to kill him right? well if voldemort killed harry's parents on the night he tried to kill harry(cuz u have to kill in order to split ur soul into pieces) then he accidentally made harry's scar a horcrux.
well......any opinions?

2007-01-23 11:17:29 · 10 answers · asked by younowho9192 2 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

10 answers

Harry comes of age (for wizards) when he turns 17, and is therefore entitled to perform magic outside of school and to obtain a licence to Apparate. His friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, and many of his classmates, already turned 17 during the sixth year, and Neville Longbottom turns 17 on July 30—The day before Harry does.
There is no explanation at the end of Half-Blood Prince as to the true identity of the mysterious "R.A.B.", who claimed to have stolen one of Voldemort's Horcruxes with the intent to destroy it, while replacing it with a fake that was recovered by Harry and Dumbledore.HBP Ch.28 The most likely candidate is Regulus Black, whom Rowling said was "a fine guess" for R.A.B.'s identity in an interview. I think that RAB is Regalus. She didn't deny it or anything.

Kreacher, the former Black family house-elf who passed into Harry's ownership with the death of Sirius Black, may make an appearance; Rowling told the filmmakers of Order of the Phoenix to include the character in the movie, because he is "very important".
Rowling stated on her web site that there is something "significant—even crucial" about why Dumbledore had James Potter's invisibility cloak in his possession.
J. K. Rowling said in 2001 that Harry might get another pet at some point.Although Buckbeak may have filled this role (Harry obtained possession of the Hippogriff after the death of Sirius Black), she also hinted that Fawkes, Dumbledore's phoenix, might have another role.
Rowling wrote the last chapter of the book some time ago, to give her an ending to work up to. The last word of the seventh book, according to Rowling, is currently "scar" , but she has also said it may change, along with the whole last chapter she has previously written. This last chapter contains details of what happens to each surviving character:
"This is the thing that I was very dubious about showing you... This is the final chapter of book seven. This is really where I wrap everything up, it's the epilogue. And I basically say what happens to everyone after they leave school - those who survive - because there are deaths - more deaths coming. It was a way of saying to myself, 'Well, you will get it, you will get to book seven one day. And then you'll need this!' So I'd just like to remind all the children I know who come around my house and start sneaking into cupboards that it's not there anymore - I don't keep it at home anymore for very, very, very obvious reasons. So there it is." – J. K. Rowling
Rowling has stated that there will be no Quidditch matches in Deathly Hallows.
We will learn something very important about Lily in Deathly Hallows:
Now, the important thing about Harry's mother - the really, really significant thing - you're going to find out in two parts. You'll find out a lot more about her in book five, or you'll find out something very significant about her in book five, and you'll find out something incredibly important about her in book seven." – J. K. Rowling
Rowling has long said that Harry's eyes resembling his mother's is important.
Severus Snape has been an important and enigmatic character throughout the books, as his true loyalty has always remained unclear. It is to be anticipated that as a surviving major character, his loyalty will be settled in the final confrontation of the book.
She has stated we will learn more about Peter Pettigrew, Dumbledore, and his family.
At the Edinburgh book festival, Rowling mentioned that something more would be revealed about Petunia Dursley. Nothing of note occurred in book 6, so this remains to be discovered.
"..there is a little bit more to Aunt Petunia than meets the eye...She is not a squib, although that is a very good guess. Oh, I am giving a lot away here. I am being shockingly indiscreet."

Rowling repeated this comment at the Radio City charity reading in August 2006. Rowling has clarified by stating that Aunt Petunia will not perform magic.
Rowling has said that some non-magical character will perform magic late in life in desperate circumstances. However, Petunia will not be the one to perform magic
Also at Edinburgh, Rita Skeeter was mentioned: "She is loathsome . . . but I can't help admiring her toughness. . . . There is more to come on Rita"
On Dolores Umbridge, "It's too much fun to torture her not to have another little bit more before I finish"
Rowling has said that Ginny Weasley is quite powerful, that we have seen a taste of that in the past, and we will see it again.
Viktor Krum is set for a reappearance.
The two-way mirror given to Harry by Sirius Black and his flying motorbike will return. In fact, Rowling has mentioned in one of her FAQs that the two way mirror "will help more than you think". Rowling refused to comment whether Sirius himself might in some way reappear, but she has also said that there was a reason why he had to die.
Dumbledore was said to have a "gleam of triumph" in his eyes when told that Voldemort had restored his body using Harry's blood, at the end of Goblet of Fire (Ch. 36). Rowling has confirmed that this is "still enormously significant".
Someone from Harry's class, not Harry, Ron, or Hermione, and not who most readers would expect, will become a Hogwarts teacher. This seems to indicate that Hogwarts will indeed re-open, though possibly not until after the main events of Deathly Hallows have occurred.
In an interview after the completion of the Prisoner of Azkaban film, she commented that director Alfonso Cuarón had "put things in the film that, without knowing it, foreshadow things that are going to happen in the final two books. So I really got goosebumps when I saw a couple of those things, and I thought people are going to look back on the film and think those were put in deliberately as clues."
There are indications that at least two of the main characters will die. In a June 2006 interview about the previously-written ending, Rowling stated that:
"One character got a reprieve, but I have to say two die that I didn't intend to die...A price has to be paid. We are dealing with pure evil...They go for the main characters... well, I do".
When further questioned in June 2006 about authors who kill off their main characters, Rowling said "I can completely understand, however, the mentality of an author who thinks, well, I'm going to kill them off because that means there can be no non-author-written sequels'".
Rowling clarified that "Dumbledore is definitely dead", when asked by Salman Rushdie and others at Radio City Music Hall in New York City. Rowling answered the same question three times, each time with increasing conviction.
When asked what questions she should have been asked, she admitted that "the final book contains a couple of pieces of information that I don't think you could guess at", and declined to explain further. On 2006-09-13 she updated her website saying that when she was asked that question, her mind went blank. Since she couldn't make amends, she created a NAQ section of her website, in tribute to the girl who asked the question. In her NAQ section, she states:
"Why did Dumbledore have James' invisibility cloak at the time of James' death, given that Dumbledore could make himself invisible without a cloak?"
2006-09-29, she reveals that Severus Snape was not under the cloak the night of the Potters' death in the Rumors Section.
Asked which five of her characters she would like to invite to dinner, she chose Harry, Hermione and Ron, but then hesitated before choosing her last characters, saying "See... I know who's actually dead", unsure whether she was permitted to invite those who are 'dead'.
Lord Voldemort was voted best villain at the Big Bad Read poll. Responding to the news Rowling commented:
"I hope those of you who voted for him in the big bad read enjoy reading about him in book seven, where he finally gets the leg room for which he has been aching all those years in exile."
At their appearance in New York City on August 1, 2006, authors John Irving and Stephen King joined Rowling at a charity benefit. While there the two famous authors came together to ask Rowling NOT to kill off Harry Potter in her final book, with Irving saying, "I'll keep my fingers crossed for Harry."

2007-01-25 11:54:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's an interesting theory but I can't say I think that's the case. I don't think horcruxes are accidentally made. It seems to me if a wizard wanted to make a horcrux then there would be some kind of spell or ceremony to go along with it. When Dumbledore said that Voldemort had left part of himself in Harry, I think he simply meant that Voldemort had given Harry the tools to fight him, that Voldemort had given Harry qualities that had made Voldemort unique.

At the same time, maybe the spell to make a horcrux, to get at the divided portions of his soul had to be said before he actually killed them, but that doesn't make much sense to me. It makes more sense to say the spell after his soul had been split but really, your theory is as good as mine. We'll only know when Rowling releases the book.

2007-01-23 16:00:31 · answer #2 · answered by Caitlin G 3 · 0 0

well, it is interesting, 4 sure. it could be. i mean, yes to make a horcrux is a process and probably needs some sort of preparation but it could also be that harry had some powers from his parents in him that just sucked a part of voldemort's soule in him. u know that after harry voldemort became a lot weaker and didn't apear any more. so it could be that harry took a part of his soule, made him weaker, and made himself the only one that can win in the fight against voldemort. but there is also a problem with that. harry would probably have to die to kill voldemort. and we all know that voldemort has to die....so it would be the end of harry potter. and tah would be bad coz even ih rowling doesn't write any more books we can dream about what happend to harry and stuff, but only of he is alive. if he dies that is the end. an apsolute THE END. i don't won't an apsolute THE END!!!! do u???

2007-01-25 05:38:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yeah cause I mean I have meet some really nice people by talking about Harry Potter and stuff even at school I talked to people I may not have normally talked to and have become friends because we both like HP.

2016-05-24 02:15:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yea I had thought of that too when I finished reading the last book, but if its true then if Harry gets killed and Voldermort is out of Horacrxes then they would both died, but who knows I thought it was possible and cant wait to find out.

2007-01-25 04:26:32 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 3 · 0 0

i've never thought about it that way. if it is the case harry would have to kill himself

2007-01-24 09:55:29 · answer #6 · answered by nikeone2022 2 · 0 0

I've actually heard this theory several times already. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

2007-01-23 14:00:57 · answer #7 · answered by megan nichole 3 · 0 0

Interesting concept.....

2007-01-23 11:21:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

lmao
srri bout dat but lke finalli sum1 is along da same lines as me!!
YAY anywayz.... go through my harry potte questions and read my theory. alot of people said its not possible or wat not but wen you read wat the clues are then it all folds out.

good luck on your theories...

2007-01-23 18:06:26 · answer #9 · answered by watching the sunset 5 · 0 0

younowho9192

2015-09-05 21:56:13 · answer #10 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers